Next Article in Journal
Calibrating a Hydrological Model by Stratifying Frozen Ground Types and Seasons in a Cold Alpine Basin
Next Article in Special Issue
Reuse of Waste Geothermal Brine: Process, Thermodynamic and Economic Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Coping with Extreme Events: Effect of Different Reservoir Operation Strategies on Flood Inundation Maps
Previous Article in Special Issue
Biological Treatment of Wastewater from Pyrolysis Plant: Effect of Organics Concentration, pH and Temperature
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Reduction of Fouling and Scaling by Calcium Ions on an UF Membrane Surface for an Enhanced Water Pre-Treatment

by
Marina Prisciandaro
1,*,
Valentina Innocenzi
1,
Francesco Tortora
1 and
Giuseppe Mazziotti di Celso
2
1
Department of Industrial and Information Engineering and of Economics, University of L’Aquila, Viale Giovanni Gronchi 18, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
2
Faculty of Bioscience, Agrofood and Environmental Technology, University of Teramo, Via R. Balzarini 1, 64100 Teramo (TE), Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2019, 11(5), 984; https://doi.org/10.3390/w11050984
Submission received: 17 April 2019 / Revised: 1 May 2019 / Accepted: 4 May 2019 / Published: 10 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Technologies for Water Reuse: Current Status and Future Challenges)

Abstract

:
The control of fouling and scaling on heat and mass transfer surfaces is of major importance in processes as superficial water treatments, since it also improves the efficiency of the whole process from an energy saving point of view. The aim of the paper is to present the experimental results obtained in the inhibition of the fouling and scaling by calcium ions on an ultrafiltration membrane surface, by using citric acid as an additive. The last is an environmentally friendly additive−a so-called “green additive”, which may represent a reliable alternative to phosphorous and nitrogen based compounds typically used as inhibitors, since it has the characteristics of being non-toxic, non-bio accumulating, and biodegradable. The experimental plant is made of a tangential flow system on a lab scale equipped with a flat sheet ultrafiltration polymeric membrane, whose cut-off is 650 nm. In the first series of experiments, the effect of water hardness and its fouling effect due to calcium ions on membrane permeability has been measured in the range of potable waters. Then, the scaling effect of high calcium concentration in solution (supersaturated conditions) has been quantified by measuring the increase in weight of the membrane, with and without the addition of citric acid as an additive; moreover, the retarding effect of citric acid has been evaluated through the measurement of the induction times for the nucleation of calcium sulfate dihydrate (used as model scalant for fouling). Experiments have been carried out at two different supersaturation ratios (S = 2.25–2.60), at room temperature, in the absence of any additive, and with a citric acid concentration varying in the range 0.01 to 0.50 g/L. Experimental results have shown that the addition of citric acid in solution delays the induction times for gypsum crystals nucleation; moreover, it mitigates the phenomenon of membrane fouling and reduces the pressure drops by allowing an acceptable permeate flow for a longer duration.

1. Introduction

Calcium sulfate scales, together with calcium carbonate scales, are the major causes of fouling on process equipment surfaces with severe drawbacks. In particular, scale deposition on heat transfer surfaces increases the resistance to the heat flow [1] and can accumulate in pipelines, orifices, and other flow passages seriously impeding the process flow. Moreover, calcium sulfate scale is one of the major cause of fouling in reverse osmosis (RO) membranes, resulting in a continuous decline in desalted water production, thus reducing the overall efficiency and increasing operation and maintenance costs [2] (Di Zio et al., 2005). Therefore, from an economic point of view, the formation of calcium sulfate mineral scales is an obstacle to the recovery of potable water from sea [3] or brackish waters as well as to the industrial utilization of many natural waters and in addition, from an environmental point of view, to the reuse of water in a closed water cycle approach [4,5] Calcium sulfate chemical and mineralogical properties of have been extensively studied: it may crystallize as calcium sulfate dihydrate (CaSO4·2H2O), calcium sulfate hemihydrate (CaSO4·1/2H2O), and calcium sulfate anhydrite (CaSO4). The most stable calcium sulfate form in water systems is calcium sulfate dihydrate [6].
The problem of calcium scaling on membrane is of major concern, not only in reverse osmosis plant for water desalination, but also in the field of superficial water. The use of ultrafiltration for drinking water production has widespread diffused during the past decade [7]. Membrane fouling may be a major obstacle to the implementation of surface water ultrafiltration, which causes higher costs of energy, operation, and maintenance [8]. Firstly, the membrane fouling occurs due to the natural total hardness of surface water. The effect is obviously amplified when water is heated or evaporated for process scopes, since the salt concentration, particularly of calcium ions, increases, reaching the saturation. As is well-known from crystallization studies and widely reported in literature [9], a supersaturation increase in a salt solution at a constant temperature results in the more rapid precipitation (shorter induction times) of a huge quantity of small crystals in solution. In more details, the inorganic ions in water that exceed the equilibrium solubility product firstly reach the nucleation stage and then go through homogeneous or heterogeneous crystal growth processes [10]. This also occurs when an aqueous solution passes through a membrane [11]. The process, when intentionally carried out, is known as membrane crystallization [12]; even if the membrane does not act as a selective barrier in this case, but the separation is based on the phase equilibrium [13]. Nowadays, membrane crystallization is a mature technology that can replace the conventional crystallizers (e.g., in seawater distillation) because of its advantages due to its adaptability and the lower energy consumption [14]. Whatever the scope of the process (water separation or salt recovery), the solution to the problem of fouling and scaling in membrane applications is very challenging.
Membrane fouling occurs during an increase in Trans-Membrane Pressure (TMP), to maintain a particular flux or during a decrease in flux when the system is operated at constant pressure [8]. Fouling can be classified as reversible fouling and irreversible fouling; it is formed due to cake formation (reversible fouling) and pore blocking (irreversible fouling). Efficient pretreatments may relieve the fouling by pre-reacting with the foulants in the feed water, such as coagulation and adsorption [15]. However, adverse effects from the pretreatment are also claimed. Additionally, operation methods such as running modes, rinsing modes, chemical cleaning, and air scouring can effectively obtain the fouling reduction. Particularly, backflushing appeared to be an efficient way to reduce the backwashable reversible fouling [8] in ultrafiltration modules [16]. A particular attention is to be paid to cleaning processes since they may cause membrane disintegration (structural changes and compromised filtration performance) [17]. Thus far, the problem of membrane fouling is still unsolved in an ultimate way.
A literature analysis has confirmed that the fundamental mechanisms and processes involved in inorganic fouling are not fully understood; it is ascertained that in natural waters (river, groundwater, rainfall, seawater and municipal wastewater), the main basin or acidic inorganic species that are in equilibrium with precipitates or potential scaling components are OH, F, CO32−, SO42−, ortho-phosphate, and silicic acids, while major cations that account for most of the precipitates directly or indirectly are Ca2+, Mg2+, Fe3+, and Al3+ [18]. Furthermore, a more recent school of thought affirms that besides feed solution characteristics and operating conditions, membrane fouling due to inorganic salts is also dependent on membrane properties (e.g., porosity, roughness, etc.), as well as module geometry and membrane materials, which influence the crystallization of inorganic salts [17,19]. Thus, one of the most straightforward and effective strategies to mitigate fouling is to render antifouling properties through the design of novel membranes [20]. Nevertheless, there is a limited information on the effect of these parameters on fouling mechanism, mostly circumscribed to the field of reverse osmosis membranes [21].
The addition of additives to a solution, which retards scale formation thus increasing the induction time (i.e., the time that elapses between the establishment of supersaturation in solution and the spontaneous nucleation of the first nuclei) and reducing the amount of salt precipitated, is a reliable and well-assessed technique to hinder or delay the scale formation, mostly in the RO system used for water desalination [22]. The effect of the additives has been measured mostly with the monitoring of permeate flux decline and salt rejection curves, widely used at the laboratory scale to assess the antiscalant effectiveness on the scaling process for reverse osmosis membranes [21]. Other techniques—always for RO membranes—are well summarized in the reviews by Shirazi et al. [19] and Antony and coworkers [21] include the direct observation of foulant accumulation on the membrane surface (SEM analysy, optical microscope, optical laser sensor), the ultrasonic time domain reflectometry (UTDR) technique and the electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS).
However, it is important to point out that the behaviors and mechanisms of membrane scaling, as well as the effect of different additives, in various membrane processes may vary significantly, due to the different working principles and feedwater compositions [23].
The additives commonly employed for gypsum scale control in process equipments are some inorganic and organic substances (e.g., phosphonates, carboxylic acids [24,25] capable of altering the surface properties of the crystals, affect nucleation and growth rate, modify crystal shape and agglomeration/dispersion behavior [26]. As for membrane processes, so far, various commercial anti-scalants (e.g., polyphosphates, organophosphonates and polyelectrolytes) have been employed to mitigate mineral scaling in membrane processes including nanofiltration, reverse osmosis, forward filtration, and membrane desalination [23]. The proper selection of an antiscalant additive depends on the water chemistry and the system design [27]. Nowadays, there is the need of finding ecofriendly additives, the so-called green additives, natural organic molecules active as scale inhibitors that are environmentally acceptable compared with conventional inhibitors [28]. Among them, there is citric acid, widely used across many industries especially in food, beverage, pharmaceutical, nutraceutical and cosmetic products [29]. This is because of the nice properties of citric acid that is a natural preservative, flavoring, and antioxidant molecule, and most of all it is non-toxic, non-bio accumulating, and biodegradable; moreover, it can be used as an antiscalant [30], particularly towards the calcium sulfate and carbonates scales.
The aim of the paper is to present the experimental results obtained on the inhibition of fouling due to calcium ions and scaling due to calcium sulfate precipitation on an ultrafiltration membrane surface, also in the presence of citric acid used as an additive. This additive has been typically used as an inhibitor for gypsum scaling on process equipments (industrial water) or RO membrane (seawater), so with waters with characteristics very different from surface waters. Firstly, the effect of water hardness due to calcium ions on membrane permeability has been measured in the range of potable waters. Then the fouling effect of high calcium concentration in solution has been quantified in terms of membrane weight and permeate fluxes as a function of time, with and without the addition of citric acid; moreover, the retarding effect of citric acid has been evaluated through the measurement of the induction times for the nucleation of calcium sulfate dihydrate, used as a model scalant. This coupling between crystallization technique and membrane equipment can be considered a reliable method for evaluating anti-scalant effectiveness of an additive on ultrafiltration membrane surfaces.

2. Materials and Methods

The experimental plant consists in a tangential flow system (MinitanTM-Millipore–see Figure 1) on a lab scale equipped with a flat sheet ultrafiltration membrane in polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), whose cut-off is 650 nm.
Two experimental series were carried out: the first series was aimed at verifying the effect of calcium concentration on membrane fouling in superficial waters acceptable for human consumption. The influence of total water hardness expressed in French degrees (°f) on membrane permeability was studied in the range of potable waters (5 to 50 °f) and compared to that of distilled water. The temperature was constant at the value T = 25 °C, while the transmembrane pressure (TMP) was changed in the range 20 to 500 kPa. In addition, a long-term experiment (200 min) was carried out for three kinds of waters of different hardness (from 5 to 50 °f).
The second experimental series was conducted in a condition of extremely high concentration of calcium and sulfate ions (supersaturated solutions), with and without the use of an additive to retard the salt precipitation, always at room temperature, as shown in Table 1. All experiments were duplicated and the average values were considered.
Citrid acid (2-hydroxy-1,2,3-propanetricarboxylic acid, C6H8O7) was used as an additive. Supersaturated solutions of calcium sulfate were prepared by mixing two clear equimolar aqueous solutions of reagent-grade CaCl2·2H2O and Na2SO4 with concentrations in the range 55–65 mol/m3.
The supersaturation ratio S was calculated considering the liquid–solid equilibrium between Ca2+ and SO42− ions and solid CaSO4·2H2O, as described by the following equation:
Ca 2 + + SO 4 2 + 2 H 2 O = CaSO 4 · 2 H 2 O
so that it is:
S = a Ca 2 + a SO 4 2 a w 2 K ps
where aJ represents the activity of the J species (J = Ca2+, SO42− and water) expressed as the product of the molality (mJ) and the activity coefficient (γJ), and Kps is the solubility product of gypsum. The value of Kps was calculated as a function of temperature by means of the following relationship:
ln ( K ps ) = 390.96 152.62 logT 12545.62 / T + 0.08 T
All the experiments were carried out for four values of additive concentrations (cCA = 0.01, 0.05, 0.10, 0.50 g/L), while the supersaturation ratio changed in the range S = 2.25–2.60. The temperature was kept constant at the value T = 25 °C while the transmembrane pressure was changed in the range 30 to 130 kPa.
For each experimental run on supersaturated solution (Table 1), the induction time has been measured with a 10% change in solution turbidity. The permeate flux has been measured at the beginning and at the end of run, and the run continued for 15 min after the beginning of gypsum precipitation in solution (induction time). Membrane flat sheet were weighted before each test, soon after the test and after drying in an oven at T = 50 °C for one hour. As for membrane cleaning, the procedure involves a series of washing with acid and basic solvents and with a specific membrane cleaning reagent Ultrasil. In our case, the fouling was due to calcium salts and therefore an acidic washing with sulfuric acid was sufficient for restoring the initial flux.
Sample of the solids taken form membrane surface were analyzed with XRD (Malvern PANalytical, Malvern, UK) and with an optical microscope (Zeiss, Axioscope FS), equipped for transmitted light work.

3. Results and Discussion

Two experimental series were carried out: The first series was aimed at verifying the effect of calcium concentration on membrane fouling in superficial waters acceptable for human consumption. In a second experimental series, mineral scale nucleation and inhibition on membrane surface was evaluated, for calcium sulfate dihydrate (gypsum) used as a model scalant.
Figure 2 reports some of the results belonging to the first series, showing the effect of total water hardness, expressed in °f, on membrane permeability in the range of potable waters (5 to 50 °f) and compared to the permeability of distilled water, at the constant T = 25 °C. The analysis of the figure shows that, as expected, membrane fluxes decrease with increasing water strength, with respect to that of distilled water. In details, the average decrease in flux at 50 °f is reduced of about 20% with respect to the corresponding value at 5 °f and of about 30% with respect to distilled water. The different behavior of water with different harness is more visible in the long-term experiments reported in Figure 3. As can be seen, relevant decreases of flux with time were observed for the three water samples of different hardness. After about three hours of filtration, there was a flux decay in the range 37%–46% at the constant transmembrane pressure of 100 kPa. Therefore, the membrane fouling due to the sole water hardness is able to cause a decrease in permeate flux with time and a limitation of the separation efficiency. Due to the buildup of a fouling layer mostly made of calcium ions, the rate of water transport through the membrane is decreased. As a result, greater pressure (i.e., energy) is required to produce the same amount of water.
As for the second experimental series, Figure 4 shows the effect of the addiction of citric acid in a calcium sulfate supersaturated solution as a function of the membrane weight for two different supersaturation ratios (S = 2.25–blue curve and S = 2.60–orange curve). As can be seen, for each supersaturation ratio, the membrane weight decreases while adding citric acid, always remaining above the initial membrane weight (0.86 g), since the effect of the additive is to inhibit the gypsum precipitation, thus diminishing the amount of salt deposited on the membrane surface.
Moreover, for a higher supersaturation ratio (orange curve), the increase in weight due to the calcium sulfate deposition of membrane surface, is higher for each citric acid concentration tested. The effect of citric acid seems to be stronger at higher S values. However, the membrane weight goes to an asymptotic value, suggesting the uselessness of increasing the additive concentration above the value of 0.1 g/L.
Figure 5a,b show how the membrane sheets look like after two experimental runs, the best case (cCA = 0.50 g/L, low supersaturation ratio—run#5) and the worst case (no additive added in solution, high supersaturation ratio—run #6). In the second case, the membrane surface appears covered by a thick layer of gypsum scale, with an increase in weight of about 55%.
Figure 6 shows the permeate flux through the membrane as a function of time for the ten experimental runs reported in Table 1.
For each curve, the permeate flux as a function of time rapidly decreases mainly due to the precipitation of gypsum on membrane surface. In each group, at the same supersaturation ratio, the addition of citric acid generally allows a final permeate flux (at t = 35 min) higher with respect to that obtained in the absence of citric acid. The run#10, with cCA = 0.50 g/L and S = 2.60 (see Table 1), notwithstanding a higher initial salt concentration, has a final permeate flux comparable to that obtained in run#2 belonging to the first group, characterized by a lower supersaturation (lower salt concentration) and a lower citric acid concentration (cCA = 0.01 g/L and S = 2.25, see Table 1).
Finally, Figure 7 shows the membrane weight as a function of induction time for different citric acid concentrations. Specific studies had already shown that the addition of citric acid allows to modify the induction time of gypsum by delaying it [31]. Data in Figure 7 show that the increase in induction time caused by citric acid also yields a reduction in the fouling of the membrane surface.
Moreover, an XRD analysis reported in Figure 8 confirmed that the solid precipitate on membrane surface is mainly made of calcium sulfate dihydrate (gypsum).
Figure 9a,b show the effect of citric acid on the morphology of gypsum crystals. In the samples taken by means of an optical microscope, it can be seen that in the presence of citric acid (Figure 9b), the morphology of gypsum had changed from the typical long needles (Figure 9a) [32] to smaller platelets. This effect of citric acid on gypsum morphology confirms what already found in literature in another field of study, namely the positive outcomes of citric acid that, beside from being a retardant for gypsum nucleation, it is known to increase the compressive strength of the calcium sulphoaluminate cements by changing the shape of crystals with an improved densification of the microstructure [33].

4. Conclusions

In this paper, the fouling and scaling effect of calcium sulfate ions in waters on ultrafiltration membranes was studied with laboratory tests in conditions typical of surface water (dilute solutions) and in supersaturated solutions. The retardant effect of citric acid on calcium sulfate crystallization (used as model scalant) on UF membrane surface has been studied by measuring the increase in weight of membrane, with and without the additive; moreover, the retarding effect of citric acid has been evaluated through the measurement of the induction times for gypsum nucleation. Experimental results confirmed that the addition of citric acid in solution delays the induction times for gypsum crystals nucleation; moreover, it mitigates the phenomenon of membrane fouling and reduces pressure drops by allowing an acceptable permeate flow for a longer duration. These results could be useful in the potabilization of surface waters, as well as in the pre-treatment of saline waters prior to reverse osmosis membrane, in order to reduce membrane fouling. Moreover, the obtained results suggest the capability of the proposed method, which couple crystallization techniques and membrane equipments to clearly discriminate among various anti-scalants with respect to their scale suppression effectiveness.

Author Contributions

Planning of the research activities, M.P. and G.M.d.C.; conducting of the experimental test, F.T and V.I.; data curation, all the authors; writing—original draft preparation, M.P; Writing—review and Editing, all the authors; visualization, all the authors; supervision, M.P.

Funding

This research received no external funding

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Amjad, Z. Calcium sulfate dihydrate (gypsum) scale formation on heat exchanger surfaces: The influence of scale inhibitors. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1988, 123, 523–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Di Zio, A.; Prisciandaro, M.; Barba, D. Disinfection of surface waters with UF membranes. Desalination 2005, 179, 297–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hasson, D.; Drak, A.; Semiat, R. Induction times induced in an RO system by antiscalants delaying CaSO4 precipitation. Desalination 2003, 157, 193–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Prisciandaro, M.; Capocelli, M.; Piemonte, V.; Barba, D. Process analysis applied to water reuse for a “closed water cycle” approach. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 304, 602–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Capocelli, M.; Prisciandaro, M.; Piemonte, V.; Barba, D. A technical-economical approach to promote the water treatment & reuse processes. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 207, 85–96. [Google Scholar]
  6. Lancia, A.; Musmarra, D.; Prisciandaro, M. Calcium sulfate. In Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 5th ed.; Othmer, K., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011; pp. 1–22. [Google Scholar]
  7. Gao, W.; Liang, H.; Ma, J.; Han, M.; Chen, Z.; Han, Z.; Li, G. Membrane fouling control in ultrafiltration technology for drinking water production: A review. Desalination 2011, 272, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Guo, W.; Ngo, H.-H.; Li, J. A mini-review on membrane fouling. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 122, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mullin, J.W. Crystallization, 4th ed.; Butterworth-Heinemann, Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  10. Al-Amoudi, A.; Lovitt, R.W. Fouling strategies and the cleaning system of NF membranes and factors affecting cleaning efficiency. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 303, 4–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lyster, E.; Kim, M.; Au, J.; Cohen, Y. A method for evaluating antiscalant retardation of crystal nucleation and growth on RO membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 364, 122–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chabanon, E.; Mangin, D.; Charcosset, C. Membranes and crystallization processes: State of the art and prospects. J. Membr. Sci. 2016, 509, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Curcio, E.; Drioli, E. Membrane distillation and related operations—A review. Sep. Purif. Rev. 2005, 34, 3586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ruiz Salmón, I.; Luis, P. Membrane crystallization via membrane distillation. In Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification; Coppens, M.O., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 258–271. [Google Scholar]
  15. Tortora, F.; Innocenzi, V.; Prisciandaro, M.; Vegliò, F.; Mazziotti di Celso, G. Heavy metal removal from liquid wastes by using micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2016, 227, 240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Prisciandaro, M.; Mazziotti di Celso, G. Back-flush effects on superficial water ultrafiltration. Desalination 2010, 256, 22–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shi, X.; Tal, G.; Hankins, N.P.; Gitis, V. Fouling and cleaning of ultrafiltration membranes: A review. J. Water Process Eng. 2014, 1, 121–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. El-Manharawy, S.; Hafez, A. Molar ratios as a useful tool for prediction of scaling potential inside RO systems. Desalination 2001, 136, 243–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shirazi, S.; Lin, C.-J.; Chen, D. Inorganic fouling of pressure-driven membrane processes—A critical review. Desalination 2010, 250, 236–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Goh, P.S.; Lau, W.J.; Othman, M.H.D.; Ismail, A.F. Membrane fouling in desalination and its mitigation strategies. Desalination 2018, 425, 130–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Antony, A.; Low, J.-H.; Gray, S.; Childress, A.E.; Le-Clech, P.; Leslie, G. Scale formation and control in high pressure membrane water treatment systems: A review. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 383, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Warsinger, D.M.; Swaminathan, J.; Guillen-Burrieza, E.; Arafat, H.A.; Lienhard, J.H.V. Scaling and fouling in membrane distillation for desalination applications: A review. Desalination 2015, 356, 294–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Tong, T.; Wallace, A.F.; Zhao, S.; Wang, Z. Mineral scaling in membrane desalination: Mechanisms, mitigation strategies, and feasibility of scaling-resistant membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2019, 579, 52–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rabizadeh, T.; Peacock, C.; Benning, L. Carboxylic acids: Effective inhibitors for calcium sulfate precipitation? Mineral. Mag. 2014, 78, 1465–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, C.; Shen, T.; Li, S.; Wang, X. Investigation of influence of low phosphorous co-polymer antiscalant on calcium sulfate dihydrate crystal morphologies. Desalination 2014, 348, 89–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Prisciandaro, M.; Olivieri, E.; Lancia, A.; Musmarra, D. PBTC as an antiscalant for gypsum precipitation: Interfacial tension and activation energy estimation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51, 12844–12851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Demadis, K.D.D.; Öner, M. Inhibitory effects of “green” additives on the crystal growth of sparingly soluble salts. In Green Chemistry Research Trends; Nova Science Publishers, Inc.: Hapog, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 265–287. [Google Scholar]
  28. Chaussemier, M.; Pourmohtasham, E.; Gelus, D.; Pécoul, N.; Perrot, H.; Lédion, J.; Cheap-Charpentier, H.; Horner, O. State of art of natural inhibitors of calciumcarbonate scaling. A reviewarticle. Desalination 2015, 356, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Verhoff, F.H. Citric Acid, Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  30. Ciriminna, R.; Meneguzzo, F.; Delisi, R.; Pagliaro, M. Citric acid: Emerging applications of key biotechnology industrial product. Chem. Cent. J. 2017, 11, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Prisciandaro, M.; Santucci, A.; Lancia, A.; Musmarra, D. Role of citric acid in delaying gypsum precipitation canadian. J. Chem. Eng. 2005, 83, 586–592. [Google Scholar]
  32. Karabelas, A.J.; Karanasiou, A.; Mitrouli, S.T. Incipient membrane scaling by calcium sulfate during desalination in narrow spacer-filled channels. Desalination 2014, 345, 146–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Velazco, G.; Almanza, J.M.; Cortés, D.A.; Escobedo, J.C.; Escalante-Garcia, J.I. Effect of citric acid and the hemihydrate amount on the properties of a calcium sulphoaluminate cement. Mater. Constr. 2014, 64, 316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Sketch of the experimental lab scale membrane plant.
Figure 1. Sketch of the experimental lab scale membrane plant.
Water 11 00984 g001
Figure 2. Membrane permeability as a function of water hardness (°f), T = 25 °C.
Figure 2. Membrane permeability as a function of water hardness (°f), T = 25 °C.
Water 11 00984 g002
Figure 3. Long term experiments for water of different hardness; T = 25 °C, TMP = 100 kPa.
Figure 3. Long term experiments for water of different hardness; T = 25 °C, TMP = 100 kPa.
Water 11 00984 g003
Figure 4. Membrane weight after drying as a function of citric acid for two supersaturation values.
Figure 4. Membrane weight after drying as a function of citric acid for two supersaturation values.
Water 11 00984 g004
Figure 5. Dry membrane after run#5 (a) and run#6 (b).
Figure 5. Dry membrane after run#5 (a) and run#6 (b).
Water 11 00984 g005
Figure 6. Membrane permeate fluxes as a function of citric acid for two supersaturation values.
Figure 6. Membrane permeate fluxes as a function of citric acid for two supersaturation values.
Water 11 00984 g006
Figure 7. Membrane weight as a function of induction times for different citric acid concentrations.
Figure 7. Membrane weight as a function of induction times for different citric acid concentrations.
Water 11 00984 g007
Figure 8. XRD analysis on solid precipitate.
Figure 8. XRD analysis on solid precipitate.
Water 11 00984 g008
Figure 9. Optical microscope analysis of gypsum crystal; (a) in the absence of citric acid (run #1); (b) in the presence of citric acid; cCA = 0.1 g/L (run #4).
Figure 9. Optical microscope analysis of gypsum crystal; (a) in the absence of citric acid (run #1); (b) in the presence of citric acid; cCA = 0.1 g/L (run #4).
Water 11 00984 g009
Table 1. Experimental runs for scaling tests with supersaturated calcium solutions.
Table 1. Experimental runs for scaling tests with supersaturated calcium solutions.
Supersaturation Ratio, S2.252.60
Run number (#)12345678910
cCA (g/L)-0.010.050.100.50-0.010.050.100.50

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Prisciandaro, M.; Innocenzi, V.; Tortora, F.; Mazziotti di Celso, G. Reduction of Fouling and Scaling by Calcium Ions on an UF Membrane Surface for an Enhanced Water Pre-Treatment. Water 2019, 11, 984. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11050984

AMA Style

Prisciandaro M, Innocenzi V, Tortora F, Mazziotti di Celso G. Reduction of Fouling and Scaling by Calcium Ions on an UF Membrane Surface for an Enhanced Water Pre-Treatment. Water. 2019; 11(5):984. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11050984

Chicago/Turabian Style

Prisciandaro, Marina, Valentina Innocenzi, Francesco Tortora, and Giuseppe Mazziotti di Celso. 2019. "Reduction of Fouling and Scaling by Calcium Ions on an UF Membrane Surface for an Enhanced Water Pre-Treatment" Water 11, no. 5: 984. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11050984

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop