Next Article in Journal
Optimization of Pump Start-Up Depth in Drainage Pumping Station Based on SWMM and PSO
Next Article in Special Issue
Insights into the Kinetics of Intermediate Formation during Electrochemical Oxidation of the Organic Model Pollutant Salicylic Acid in Chloride Electrolyte
Previous Article in Journal
A Targeted Grouting and Water Blocking Method Based on Hydrological Tracer Testing and Its Engineering Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pristine and Graphene-Quantum-Dots-Decorated Spinel Nickel Aluminate for Water Remediation from Dyes and Toxic Pollutants
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Studies on the Kinetics of Doxazosin Degradation in Simulated Environmental Conditions and Selected Advanced Oxidation Processes

Department of Biology and Chemistry, University of Bialystok, Ciołkowskiego 1K, 15-245 Białystok, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2019, 11(5), 1001; https://doi.org/10.3390/w11051001
Submission received: 1 April 2019 / Revised: 9 May 2019 / Accepted: 10 May 2019 / Published: 13 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Removal of Organic Pollution in Water Environment)

Abstract

:
The photochemical behavior of doxazosin (DOX) in simulated environmental conditions using natural waters taken from local rivers as a solvent was studied. The chemical characteristics of applied waters was done and a correlation analysis was used to explain the impact of individual parameters of matrix on the rate of the DOX degradation. It was stated that DOX is a photoliable compound in an aqueous environment. Its degradation is promoted by basic medium, presence of environmentally important ions such as Cl, NO3, SO42 and organic matter. The kinetics of DOX reactions with OH and SO4 radicals were examined individually. The UV/H2O2, classical Fenton and photo-Fenton processes, were applied for the generation of hydroxyl radicals while the UV/VIS:Fe2(SO4)3:Na2SO2 system was employed for production of SO4 radicals. The obtained results pointed that photo-Fenton, as well as UV/VIS:Fe2(SO4)3:Na2SO2, are very reactive in ratio to DOX, leading to its complete degradation in a short time. A quantitative density functional theory (DFT) mechanistic study was carried out in order to explain the molecular mechanism of DOX degradation using the GAUSSIAN 09 program.

1. Introduction

Recent environmental studies show an appearance of new atypical compounds in aquatic ecosystems on a global scale. Called Emerging Organic Contaminants (EOC), they are created by hundreds of organic compounds belonging to different chemical classes [1]. Some of them are natural components of an environment, making their presence detectable due to advancements in sample preparation procedures [2,3,4], as well as new detection techniques [5,6,7]. They have been detected in clean surface waters at few ng dm−3 levels while in polluted waters in the range from a few to hundreds of μg dm−3 [8,9]. Many EOC-s compounds do not cause acute toxicity, but their presence in the environment entails a number of adverse changes, including interference in animal as well as human endocrine systems [1]. Compounds that exhibit such activity or are suspected of it are named Endocrine Disrupting Compounds (EDC). According to the definition given by The Endocrine Society, EDCs are: “an exogenous chemical, or mixture of chemicals, that interferes with any aspect of hormone action” [10]. One of the more numerous groups belonging to EDCs are traces of pharmaceuticals [1,8]. The main identified source of pharmaceuticals in surface freshwater environments are from wastewater treatment plants (WTP) [11]. Some compounds from the EDC-s group, especially pharmaceuticals, possess biocidal properties or are resistant to biodegradation, so the WTP-s based on activated sludge technology are unable to remove all of them [12]. Therefore, the search for improvements that can be made to the water purification process is still currently a problem. The following modifications of the water technology were developed and introduced into practice: membrane bioreactors, purification ponds with aquatic plants, application of new microorganisms, enzymatic treatments [12] or advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) [13,14]. The advanced oxidation units are based on oxidation reactions of reactive chemical species such as hydroxyl, sulfate, chlorine and other radicals with organic pollutants [13,14]. Although AOPs are considered to be the most effective way for water treatment, their efficiency depends on many factors such as type of process, type and composition of the polluted water, and chemical properties of degraded contaminants [15,16]. Additionally, cost of operation as well as environmental implications should be considered [16]. Therefore, the introduction of AOP into the treatment process requires the optimization of the chemical conditions of an applied reaction and recognition of the chemical behavior of a main organic pollutant.
This paper presents the results of studies on kinetics of doxazosin (DOX) degradation under influence of light and some selected AOPs. Doxazosin mesylate [(4-amino-6,7-dimethoxy-2-quinazolinyl)-4-(1,4-benzodioxan-2-yl-carbonyl)-piperazine monomethansulphonate] (Figure 1) belongs to the group of (α1)-adrenoreceptor antagonists [17]. It is used for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia [17,18] and blood hypertension [18]. It is well absorbed by the digestive tract after oral administration. Afterwards, it is partially metabolized and excreted with urine in the unchanged form (about 4.8%) and in the form of metabolites: products of demethylation (23%) and hydroxylation (12%) [19]. To the best of our knowledge, DOX chemical behavior under the influence of light or AOPs has not been reported yet. Among many available AOPs reactions, the runs of UV/Vis direct photolysis, UV-H2O2, classical and photo-Fenton processes, and oxidation by SO4· were studied [16]. Attempts have been made to assess the persistence of DOX in aquatic environment and indicate the environmental factors affecting the rate of its vanishing. For this purpose, DOX degradation rate under irradiation of sunlight in the presence of natural matrix was determined.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

Doxazosin mesylate, DOX (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany), a stock solution at the concentration 2 × 10−3 mol dm−3 was prepared by dissolving an appropriate weight in 25 mL of MilliQ water. Working solutions at the concentrations 1.0 × 10−6, 2.5 × 10−6, 5.0 × 10−6, 10−5, 1.5 × 10−5 and 2 × 10−5 mol dm−3 were prepared by dilution in MilliQ water. Ferric sulfate (Fe2(SO4)3) and anhydrous sodium sulfite (Na2SO3) were purchased from Chempur, Poland. Standard solution of ferric sulfate (2.5 × 10−3 mol dm−3) was freshly prepared every day by the dissolution of an exact weighted amount in 50 mL of MilliQ water. Stock solution (5 × 10−3 mol dm−3) of anhydrous sodium sulfite was freshly prepared every day from the pure product by dissolving an appropriate amount in 100 mL of MilliQ water.
Acetonitrile and methanol of HPLC grade were supplied by Sigma-Aldrich.
Tert–butyl alcohol (TBA) were purchased from Honeywell, Riedel-de HaënTM.
Hydrogen peroxide (CHEMPUR, Poland) at the concentration of 10−1, 5 × 10−2, 10−2, 2 × 10−2, 2 × 10−3 and 10−3 mol dm−3 were prepared daily by suitably diluting its 30% solution in MilliQ water.
Other reagents used were: Concentrated acetic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), concentrated ammonium (Sigma-Aldrich), sodium hydroxide and sulfuric acid solutions at the concentration 1 mol dm−3 (POCh, Gliwice, Poland).

2.2. Irradiation Systems

All irradiation experiments were carried out using UV lamps and solar light simulator.
UV lamps—standard 16AV, (Cobrabid, Poznan, Poland) equipped with two light sources emitting radiation at 254 and 365 nm was used. All examined samples were irradiated by radiation at 365 nm as a representation of natural solar radiation UV-A.
Solar light simulator (SUNTEST CPS+, ATLAS, Champaign, IL, USA) emitting radiation in the range of 300–800 nm was used for experiments in simulated natural conditions.
The intensity of light sources was measured using potassium Reinecke’s salt actinometer. The intensity (Es) of radiation emitted by UV lamp was found to be 17.39 W m2 while for the solar light simulator it was 19.53 W m2.

2.3. Absorbance Measurements

Monitoring of the current concentration of DOX was carried out spectrophotometically by reading the absorbance at 246 nm. For qualitative assessment of changes in DOX concentration, a calibration plot (ABS = 5.2 × 104 ± 1.4 × 102 (DOX) + 0.8 × 10−2 ± 4.1 ×10−3, r2 = 0.999, where ABS—absorbance, (DOX) —concentration of DOX in mol dm−3) was constructed for concentrations in the range 10−6–2.0 × 10−5 mol dm−3. The developed spectrophotometric method of DOX determination was characterized by low LOQ and LOD values equal 7.7 × 10−7 and 2.3 ×10−7 mol dm−3, respectively. All spectrophotometric measurements were conducted with a Hitachi U-2800A spectrophotometer (Hitachi High-Technologies Europe GmbH (Mannheim Office), Mannheim, Germany). The following working settings of the device were used: scan speed 1200 nm min−1 and spectral bandwidth 1.5 nm.

2.4. Experimental Procedures

All irradiation experiments were conducted in a crystallization dish with 100 mL capacity with surface area open to atmosphere.

2.5. Direct Photolysis

50 milliliters of working solution of DOX at the concentration of 2.0 × 10−5 mol dm−3 was subjected to irradiation by a UV-lamp emitting radiation at 336 nm or to solar light in a solar simulator chamber. The spectrum of the solution was recorded every 10 min. A mixture of reagents without DOX irradiated at the same period of time was applied as a blank.
The pH of the aqueous solution was adjusted with 0.1 mol dm−3 H2SO4 or 0.1 mol dm−3 NaOH. pH was measured with an Elmetron CP-501 pH-meter (produced by ELMETRON, Zabrze, Poland) equipped with a pH-electrode EPS-1 (ELMETRON, Zabrze, Poland). The examination of photolysis in the environmental condition was done in the same manner as described above, using samples of surface water as a solvent.

2.6. H2O2—Assisted Photodegradation Process

H2O2-assisted photodegradation was studied using a working solution of DOX at the concentration 2.0x10−5 mol dm−3. For this purpose, an appropriate volume of DOX aqueous solution was mixed with varying volumes of hydrogen peroxide so as to obtain final concentration of the oxidant in the range 10−1–10−3 mol dm−3. The pH of prepared mixtures was adjusted by adding a proper portion of NaOH or H2SO4 solution at the concentration 0.1 mol dm−3. Mixtures prepared in this way were thereafter subjected to irradiation by UV lamp (λ = 365 nm) for 120 min. The spectrum of the reaction solution was recorded every 10 min using the irradiated mixture of reagents without DOX as a blank.

2.7. Fenton and Photo-Fenton Processes

The run of Fenton of photo-Fenton process was studied using an aqueous solution of DOX at concentration 2.0 × 10−5 mol dm−3. For this purpose, a volume of 50 mL of working DOX solution acidified to an optimal pH by 0.1 mol dm−3 H2SO4 solution was mixed with variable volumes of H2O2 (10−2 mol dm−3) and FeSO4 (10−2 mol dm−3). The molar ratio of Fenton reagent ingredients was kept 1:1, and their final concentrations were 10−4, 5 ×10−5, 10−5 and 5 × 10−6 mol dm−3. Every 10 min, the spectrum of the reaction mixture was recorded against the mixture of reagents without DOX as a blank.
In the case of examination of the photo-Fenton process, the prepared mixtures were subjected to irradiation by UV light at 365 nm.

2.8. Photo Sulfite System

The following procedure was applied: initially, 0.456 mL of the doxazosin standard solution at the concentration of 2.0 × 10−3 mol dm−3 was introduced into a 50 mL volumetric flask. Next, a small volume of water was added followed by the introduction of 1 mL of ferric sulphate (VI) at the concentration of 2.5 × 10−3 mol dm−3 and 1 mL of sodium sulphite at the concentration of 0.05 mol dm−3. After adding individual reagents, the 50 mL flask was filled to the mark with Milli-Q water. The prepared mixture was then subject to the irradiation by simulated solar light or UV light at λ = 365 nm. Like previously, the spectrum of the irradiated mixture was recorded using the irradiated mixture of reagents without DOX as a blank.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Initial Studies

At the beginning of the performed experiments, a UV spectrum of doxazosin aqueous solution was recorded. Its spectral characteristics possessed three distinct maxima: sharp and intense at 196 and 246 nm, and broad and less intense at 328 nm (Figure 2). The kinetics of doxazosin decay was observed by monitoring the changes at 246 nm.

3.2. Direct Photolysis in Laboratory Conditions

The photostability of doxazosin in laboratory conditions was checked first. For this purpose, a portion of 50 mL of an aqueous solution of DOX at the concentration 2.0 × 10−5 mol dm−3 was subjected to irradiation by UV (λ = 365 nm) or simulated solar light. It was stated that DOX is a photoliable compound. The following changes in its spectral characteristics were observed: the intensity of the band at 246 nm was gradually decreased while at 328 nm was growing (Figure 2). The rate of the DOX photodegradation process is affected by the type of light, pH of the reaction solution, and the kind of accompanied matrix. It was observed that the process of direct photolysis is more evident under the influence of UV radiation. The obtained results are gathered in Table 1. Additionally, it was noticed that basic pH promotes DOX decomposition, presumably due to the hydrolysis process. Stability experiments were performed in order to confirm this assumption. For this purpose, a series of aqueous solutions of DOX with different pH (in range 1–13) were prepared and thermostated in 0, 30 and 80 °C for 6 h. The used test tubes were wrapped with aluminum foil in order to protect them against light. The UV spectrum of an examined solution was recorded every 20 minutes. It was stated that DOX is stable in an absence of stressed conditions in acidic, neutral and basic medium [20]. Slight signs of hydrolysis were observed in basic solutions heated at the temperature of 80 °C. The assayed value of the hydrolysis rate constant at a temperature of 80 °C and in a basic medium was equal to 3 × 10−5 min−1.

3.3. Factors Influencing Photolysis of Doxazosin in Environmental Conditions

The stability of doxazosin under simulated environmental conditions was checked next. The goal of this experiment was to answer what the persistence of this compound in natural conditions was. As the chemical composition of natural surface waters is very complex and difficult for reconstruction, real samples of water taken from local rivers were used as solvents for preparing working solutions of DOX. The chemical assessment of the quality of the applied waters showed that the rivers from which the samples were supplied were unpolluted (Table 2). Only in the case of river 3 did the levels of SO42− and NO3 ions exceed the acceptable reference values. This river flows through agricultural areas and the elevated levels of these ions may be caused by run-offs of fertilizers from fields.
The photochemical experiments proved that natural waters created an effective chemical system [21]. The observed decomposition rates were similar and strongly dependent on the kind of irradiation used. It was observed that rates of the degradation of DOX under influence of solar light ran two to five times faster than those of the UV-induced process (Table 1) and varied in the range of 7.0 × 10−3–14.5 × 10−3 min−1. The photolysis experiments with laboratory solutions of DOX in the presence of carbonate ions (pH 8.3) implied that DOX is photoliable compounds and its photodecomposition proceeds mainly via direct photolysis. The created intermediate products, radicals, were initiating a chain process which is inhibited in the presence of radical quenchers such as organic matter or carbonate ions. It was observed that the presence of carbonate and bicarbonate ions did not affect the rate of studied process. This observation allowed us to conclude that the degradation of DOX was independent of changes in the concentration of free radicals in the irradiated solution, but a situation in natural environment was more complicated. This medium is rich in organic matter and a variety of inorganic ions. It is known that dissolved organic matter is photoliable and its products launch a series of reactions with accompanied chemical species [22,23]. If the decomposition of DOX occurs as a result of direct photolysis alone, the rate of its decomposition in the presence of such complex matrix should decrease due to competition for light access. The observed rate of DOX degradation was at least twice higher than this for laboratory solutions. Not so high acceleration of the degradation rate in the presence of the matrix from river 1 could be attributed to a decrease in an energy flux attained by the doxazosin molecules. The acceleration of the decomposition rate, especially visible in the water from river 3, was probably caused by the presence of a variety of inorganic ions which are photosensitive. The photochemical reactions of chloride, nitrate and sulfate ions created a complicated chain of radical reactions which led to the generation of hydrogen peroxide and hydroxyl, sulfate and nitrate radicals, as well as other radicals [24,25,26,27]. The high rate of DOX disappearance in the presence of matrix from the river 3 can be explained as a synergistic action of the system rich in reactive species derived from inorganic ions and organic matter. Chloride radicals can be generated as a result of the direct photolysis:
Cl + hν → Cl· + e
Cl· + Cl ↔ Cl2
or as the result of their interaction with other oxidants, among other excited triplet states of organic sensitizers (3SENS*) [25]:
OH· + Cl ↔ HOCl ↔ OH + Cl
HOCl· ↔ H+ ↔ H2O + Cl
HOCl· + Cl ↔ O + Cl2
SO4· → SO42− + Cl
3SENS* + Cl → SENS·+ Cl· or 3SENS* + 2Cl → SENS·+ Cl2
The photochemical reactions of NO3 contribute to an increase of the overall concentration of reactive species in the reaction environment as a consequence of the following processes [27,28]:
NO3 + hν → NO3−* → NO2+ O(3P)
or NO3 + hν → NO3* → NO2· + O·
O·− + H+·OH
The following equilibria are established in the presence of sulfate ions [29]:
H+ + SO42− ↔ HSO4
SO42− + Cl∙ ↔ SO4· + Cl
The HSO4 ion reacts with OH∙ radical producing less reactive sulfate radical which however, is involved in the production of more reactive species [29]:
SO4· + H2O → H+ + SO42− + HO
SO4· + OH → SO42− + HO
The acceleration of the decomposition rate of the DOX solution with matrix from river 4 can be assigned to the photo-Fenton process occurring in the presence of dissolved organic matter which is responsible for production of the reactive radicals (HO, O(3P), O, H2O2) [30,31].
The obtained results pointed out that the decomposition of doxazosin in a natural environment is a very complex process that depends on the chemical composition of an accompanied matrix. It can be stated that the photoreactions of the matrix lead to the increase of the overall concentration of highly reactive radicals such as HO·, which is predominant and mainly responsible for the acceleration of DOX decomposition rate [32].

3.4. Kinetics of DOX Decomposition Under Influence of Some Advanced Oxidation Processes

Four advanced oxidation systems: UV/H2O2, classical, and photocatalytic Fenton reaction, and photo-sulfite systems were chosen from among a number of possible AOPs methods, and their efficiency in DOX degradation were examined. The kinetics of DOX decomposition under the influence of UV/H2O2, system was studied first. The influence of an oxidant concentration in the range 10−4–10−2 mol dm−3 and pH (3.85–8) was checked. It was stated that the degradation of DOX in the UV/H2O2 system fit the pseudo-first order reaction. An addition of hydrogen peroxide caused a three-to-eight-fold increase in the reaction rate in comparison to the direct photolysis process. The observed enhancement depends on the used light, concentration of oxidant, and pH (Table 1 and Table 3). It was noted that the increase in hydrogen peroxide concentration increased the reaction rate, but this augmentation was rather slight. The 100-fold reinforcement in the oxidant concentration amplified the reaction rate by only 7%. Analogically, as in the case of direct photolysis, the basic pH promoted the studied process, as the acidic pH of the rate of reaction was almost negligible. The role of the oxidant and light was checked next. For this purpose, two series of DOX aqueous solutions at pH 8 with the concentrations 2.0 × 10−5 mol dm−3 and 2.5 × 10−5 mol dm−3 were prepared. Appropriate volumes of H2O2 working solutions were added to each test tube so that the concentration of the oxidant was in the range 10−5–5 × 10−4 mol dm−3. Each test tube was wrapped with aluminum foil in order to protect against light and subsequently left at ambient temperature for 24 h. Thereafter, the spectra of each mixture were recorded. No changes in the spectral characteristics of doxazosin were observed, which proves the important dual role of light in this process. On the one hand, light induces the process of direct DOX photolysis, while on the other hand it breaks down the dihydrogen peroxide into hydroxyl radicals according to the reaction [33]:
H2O2 + hν → 2OH·
Considering the above findings, it could be concluded that the observed enhancement in the rate of DOX degradation is a sum of the two above processes.
The classical Fenton system consisting of a solution of inorganic ferrous salt and hydrogen peroxide was examined next. The operation of the Fenton system is very complex and not fully known yet. The reaction mechanism involves the generation of hydroxyl radical according to the following reaction) [34]:
Fe2+ + H2O2 → Fe3+ + OH· + OH
Its efficiency in the degradation of organic pollutants is affected by the concentration of reagents, their molar ratio, and pH of reaction medium. In order to select the optimal concentrations of Fenton reagent components allowed to follow DOX degradation kinetics, a series of experiments were carried out using different concentrations of ingredients at their molar ratio of 1: 1. For this purpose, the concentrations in the range 5 × 10−6–5 × 10−4 mol dm−3 were applied. The second order kinetics was assumed for studied Fenton and photo-Fenton systems. It was stated that at the lowest examined concentration, the observed process proceeded too slowly, but when the highest one was used, the total disappearance of the drug was observed in five minutes after the initiation of the reaction. The Fenton reagent with the concentration of 10−4 mol dm−3 of the components was selected for further testing, resulting in the determination of the kinetic parameters of DOX degradation with good precision. The influence of pH was checked next; it is known that the optimal working pH for the studied process is contained in the range 2–5 [34]. At an excess of hydrogen ions, less reactive positively charged ferrous species are formed [35]. Additionally, the surplus of hydrogen ions act as radical scavengers according to the following reaction:
H+ + ·OH → H2O
The precipitation of Fe(II) and Fe(III) hydroxides is observed at pH > 5. In order to select the best pH for the DOX degradation, rates of reaction at various pH values in the range 2–5 were measured. The obtained output showed that pH 3.5 was optimal for the studied process.
The influence of molar ratio of the Fenton reagent constituents on kinetics of DOX degradation was checked. The following molar ratios of nH2O2:nFe(III) = 1:1, 2:1, 10:1, and 1:2, 1:5, 1:10 were used. The obtained results demonstrated (Table 3) that the use of an excess of hydrogen peroxide in ratio to ferrous ions promotes the degradation process while the reverse ratio is unfavorable for the course of the reaction. Following this, the effect of UV radiation on the course of the DOX decomposition reaction with the Fenton reagent was examined. The results shown in Table 3 proved that application of light enhanced the efficiency of the Fenton process due to the following process [34]:
Fe3+ + hν + H2O → Fe2+ + ·OH + H+
The regeneration of ferrous ions increased the overall concentration of hydroxide radicals and slowed down an increase in pH of reaction medium [34].
Recently, the use of sulphate radicals to remove organic compounds from waters has attracted more attention due to their stability and high oxidation potential (2.5–3.1 V vs. NHE) [36]. Additionally, they can work in a wide range of pH, so a rigid control of this parameter is not necessary [37,38]. The prevailing type of oxidant in the reaction environment depends on value of the initial pH. It was found that SO4· radicals predominate at the acidic pH, while at the basic pH ·OH radicals are responsible for oxidation of organic compounds [37,38]. The only disadvantage of using sulphate radicals is the necessity to activate precursors to obtain the right concentration of the oxidant [37,38]. An alternative to conventional methods for production of SO4· radicals ferric sulphate-sodium sulphite system in the presence of light was proposed [39]. This system is based on Fe-catalyzed sulphite oxidation and photochemical cycle of Fe(III)-Fe(II) species. For this reason, it can be considered a modification of the Fenton system [39]:
Fe3+ + HSO3 ↔ FeSO3+ + H+
FeSO3+ → Fe2+ + SO3
SO3 + O2 → SO5
SO5 + HSO3 → SO4 + SO42−
SO5∙− + SO5∙− ↔ 2SO4∙− + O2
SO5∙− + SO5∙− ↔ SO3∙− + HSO5
Fe2+ + HSO5 → SO4 + Fe3+ + OH
FeSO3+ + light → Fe2+ + SO3
FeOH2+ + light → Fe2+ + ·OH
The results of the above chain of reactions is a mixture of a variety of radicals where SO4· and ·OH are predominant [39].
The kinetics of DOX degradation under the influence of UV/Vis-Fe(III)-sulphite system was examined. For this purpose, a series of DOX solutions at concentration 2.0 × 10−5 mol dm−3 were mixed with variable volumes of ferric sulphate solution at the concentration 2.5 × 10−3 mol dm−3 and sodium sulphite at the concentration 5 × 10−2 mol dm−3. The applied concentrations of reagents are shown in Table 3.
The obtained results showed that the efficiency of light- Fe(III)-sulphite system depends on the molar ratio of reagents and the applied light. It was observed that the use of 10-fold excess of Na2SO3 in ratio to Fe2(SO4)3 and irradiation by solar light resulted in total DOX decomposition in 90 minutes. In order to recognize the main oxidizing agent in the light- Fe(III)-sulphite system the scavenging experiments for the degradation of DOX were performed by adding tert-butyl alcohol (TBA) to the reaction medium. The applied final concentration of TBA was 0.5 mol dm−3 while ferric sulphate and sodium sulphite were 10−3, respectively. The kinetic graphs of DOX concentration changes without the presence of TBA outlined in Figure 3, show that DOX degradation by the Fe(III)-sulphite process is mainly caused by sulphate radicals’ oxidative action. At the presence of tert-butyl alcohol, the lesser extent of DOX decay was achieved by approximately 20%. This effect was particularly pronounced in an initial stage of the reaction. As the rate of TBA reaction with hydroxyl radicals is approximately 1000-fold greater than that with sulphate radicals [39], it could be concluded that SO4 radicals are the major reactive species responsible for DOX degradation.

3.5. A DFT Mechanistic Study of the DOX Decomposition

In order to gain a deeper understanding of the initial stages of the process of molecular degradation of doxazosin, a quantitative DFT mechanistic study was carried out. The calculations were performed with the GAUSSIAN 09 program [40]. To accurately capture properties of the transition states, a DFT functional M06-2X [41], designed especially for the chemical kinetics, was utilized in combination with a Dunning’s correlation consistent basis set cc-pVDZ. This theory level is sufficient to capture the physical change along the reaction coordinate for processes investigated here. To model the solvent (water) effect, the CPCM approach was used [42], as implemented in the G09 program. The reaction course is outlined in Figure 4, and all the species involved are pictured in Figure 5. As seen from Figure 4, the reaction is initialized by the addition of the –OH group to the aromatic carbon (atom 7). It is well known that such processes go through short-lived intermediate (thermodynamically controlled step) and transition states (kinetic control) to form an adduct vulnerable to further degradation. It starts with breaking the bond between the addition center and neighboring nitrogen (N10), which is followed by the internal H transfer to form an intermediate (IM3) with keto and amino groups on the bond breaking sites (atoms C7 and N10). The actual destruction of the molecular structure occurs via breaking bond between N3 and C7. Recently, a scheme of the DOX decomposition based on the B3LYP results was proposed [43]. The favorable pathway takes place by cracking bonds N12-C15 and N12-C16. We tried to reproduce this scheme; however, at the M06-2X/cc-pVDZ theory level, no proper transition states leading to ring degradation were found despite many attempts. Nevertheless, since the molecule break-up proposed here starts at the closest vicinity of the bonds N12-C15 and N12-C16 (see Figure 5), our results led to the products with similar molecular masses as those proposed in [43]. As such, their experimental analysis supports both proposed pathways.

4. Conclusions

The obtained results show that doxazosin is a photoliable compound. Experiments done with laboratory solutions demonstrated that DOX direct photolysis is promoted by the basic medium and proceeds faster under the influence of UV light. It was stated that observed degradation of DOX is the result of direct photolysis. The presence of natural matrix acted as a photosensitizer and accelerated the degradation process. The presented surface waters natural radicals made DOX more sensitive to visible light. The run of DOX degradation under influence of some AOP-s were examined. Among the processes taken under consideration, photo-Fenton reaction and Vis/Fe(III)-SO32− appeared to be the most efficient.
The DFT mechanistic study provided an understanding of the role of OH ion in the photolysis process and pointed out which transformations of molecule lead to its decomposition. It was stated that the initial step of the process is the formation of unstable adduct by bonding the −OH group to the C7 carbon of the aromatic ring. The calculation pointed to the dissociation of the bond between N3 and C7, which lead to molecule disintegration, followed by the internal H transfer and formation of the IM3 intermediate.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.K. (Joanna Karpinska) and A.S.; methodology J.K. (Joanna Karpinska) and A.S.; DFT study, A.R.; investigation, J.K. (Jolanta Koldys), and A.S.; writing—J.K. (Joanna Karpinska), A.R.; writing—review and editing, J.K. (Joanna Karpinska) and A.S.; visualization, A.R. and A.S.; supervision, J.K. (Joanna Karpinska).

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Computational Center of the University of Bialystok (Grant GO-008) for providing access to the supercomputer resources and the GAUSSIAN 09 program.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Generation and potential engineering solutions. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2017, 8, 40–56. [CrossRef]
  2. Dimpe, K.M.; Nomngongo, P.N. Current sample preparation methodologies for analysis of emerging pollutants in different environmental matrices. Trends Anal. Chem. 2016, 82, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sajid, M.; Płotka-Wasylka, J. Combined extraction and microextraction techniques: Recent trends and future perspectives. Trends Anal. Chem. 2018, 103, 74–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, X.; Huang, P.; Ma, X.; Du, X.; Lu, X. Enhanced in-out-tube solid-phase microextraction by molecularly imprinted polymers-coated capillary followed by HPLC for endocrine disrupting chemical analysis. Talanta 2019, 194, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Aznar, R.; Albero, B.; Sanchez-Brunete, C.; Miguel, E.; Martin-Girela, I.; Tadeo, J.L. Simultaneous determination of multiclass emerging contaminants in aquatic plants by ultrasound-assisted matrix solid-phase dispersion and GC-MS. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 7911–7920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Loos RTavazzi, S.; Mariani, G.; Suurkuusk, G.; Paracchini, B.; Umlauf, G. Analysis of emerging contaminants in water, fish and suspended particulate matter (SPM) in the joint danube survey using solid phase extraction followed by UHPLC-MS-MS and GC analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 607–608, 1201–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Jauković, Z.D.; Grujić, S.D.; Bujagić, I.V.M.; Lauśević, M.D. Determination of sterols and steroid hormones in surface water and wastewater using liquid chromatography-atmospheric pressure chemical ionization-mass spectrometry. Microchem. J. 2017, 135, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ebele, A.J.; Abdallah, M.A.-E.; Harrad, S. Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in the freshwater aquatic environment. Emerg. Contracept. 2017, 3, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tran, N.H.; Reinhard, M.; Gin, K.Y.-H. Occurrence and fate of emerging contaminants in municipal wastewater treatment plants from different geographical regions—A review. Water Res. 2018, 133, 182–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Gore, A.C.; Chappell, V.A.; Fenton, S.E.; Flaws, J.A.; Nadal, A.; Prins, G.S.; Toppari, J.; Zoeller, R.T. EDC-2: The endocrine society’s second scientific statement on endocrine-disrupting chemicals. Endocr. Rev. 2015, 36, E1–E150. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  11. Blum, K.M.; Andersson, P.L.; Ahrens, L.; Wiberg, K.; Haglund, P. Persistence, mobility and bioavailability of emerging organic contaminants discharged from sewage treatment plants. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 612, 1532–1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Grandclement, C.; Seyssiecq, I.; Piram, A.; Wong-Wah-Chung, P.; Vanot, G.; Tiliacos, N.; Roche, N.; Doumeng, P. From the conventional biological wastewater treatment to hybrid process, the evaluation of organic micropollutant removal: A review. Water Res. 2017, 111, 297–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Boczkaj, G.; Fernandes, A. Wastewater treatment by means of advanced process at basic pH conditions: A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 320, 608–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gmurek, M.; Olak-Kucharczyk, M.; Ledakowicz, S. Photochemical decomposition of endocrine disrupting compounds—A review. Chem Eng. J. 2017, 310, 437–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ismail, L.; Ferronato, C.; Fine, L.; Jaber, F.; Chovelon, J.M. Effect of water constituents on the degradation of sulfaclozine in the three systems UV/TiO2, UV/K2S2O8, and UV/TiO2/K2S2O8. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 2561–2663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Fast, S.A.; Gude, V.G.; Truax, D.D.; Martin, J.; Magbanua, B.S. A critical evaluation of advanced oxidation processes for emerging contaminants removal. Environ. Process 2017, 4, 283–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Omar, M.A.; Mohamed, A.-M.I.; Derayea, S.M.; Hammad, M.A.; Mohamed, A.A. An efficient spectrofluorimetric method adopts doxazosin, terazosin and afluzosin coupling with orthophtalaldehyde: Application in human plasma. Spectochim. Acta Part A 2018, 195, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Jekell, A.; Kalani, M.; Kahan, T. The effects of alpha 1-adrenoceptor blockade and angiotensyn converting enzyme inhibition on central and brachial blood pressure and vascular reactivity: The doxazosin-ramipril study. Heart Vessels 2017, 32, 674–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Anzenbacher, P.; Zanger, U.M. Metabolism of Drugs and Other Xenobitics; John Willey & Sons: Weinheim, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ojha, T.; Bakshi, M.; Charkraborti, A.K.; Singh, S. The ICH guidance in practice: Stress decomposition studies on three piperazinyl quinazoline adrenergic receptor—Blocking agents and comparison of their degradation behaviour. J. Pharm. Biomed Anal. 2003, 31, 775–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zafirou, O.C.; Joussot-Dubien, J.; Zepp, R.G.; Zika, R.G. Photochemistry of natural waters. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1984, 18, 358A–371A. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chen, Y.; Liu, L.; Liang, J.; Wu, B.; Zuo, J.; Zuo, Y. Role of humic substances in the photodegradation of naproxen under simulated sunlight. Chemosphere 2017, 187, 261–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Canonica, S. Oxidation of organic contaminants induced by excited triplet states. Chimia 2007, 61, 641–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yang, Y.; Pignatello, J. Participation of halogens in photochemical reactions in natural and treated waters. Molecules 2017, 22, 1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zhang, K.; Parker, K.M. Halogen radical oxidants in natural and engineered aquatic systems. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 9579–9594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Devi, L.G.; Munikrishnappa, C.; Nagraj, B.; Rajashekhar, K.E. Effect of chloride and sulfate ions on the advanced photo Fenton and modified photo-Fenton degradation of alizarin red S. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2013, 374–375, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zepp, R.G.; Holgne, J.; Bader, H. Nitrate-induced photooxidation of trace organic chemicals in water. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1987, 21, 443–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Calza, P.; Vione, D.; Novelli, A.; Pelizzetti, E.; Minero, C. The role of nitrite and nitrate ions as photosensitizers in the phototransformation of phenolic compounds in seawater. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 439, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Machutek, A.J.; Morales, J.E.F.; Okano, L.T.; Silvero, C.A.; Quina, F.H. Photolysis of ferric ions in the presence of sulfate or chloride ions: Implications for the photo-Fenton process. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2009, 8, 985–991. [Google Scholar]
  30. Zepp, R.G.; Faust, B.C.J.; Holgne, J. Hydroxyl formation in aqueous reactions (pH 3–8) of iron(II) with hydrogen peroxide: The photo-Fenton reaction. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1992, 26, 313–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gao, H.; Zepp, R.C. Factors influencing photoreactions of dissolved organic matter in a coastal river of the Southeastern United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1998, 32, 2940–2946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zepp, R.C.; Schlozhauerm, P.F.; Simmons, M.S.; Miller, G.C.; Baughman, G.L.; Wolfe, N.L. Dynamics of pollutant photoreactions in hydrosphere. Fresenius Z. Anal. Chem. 1984, 319, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Legrini, O.; Oliveros, E.; Braun, A.M. Photochemical processes for water treatment. Chem. Rev. 1993, 93, 671–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jain, B.; Singh, A.K.; Kim, H.; Lichtfouse, E.; Sharma, V.K. Treatment of organic pollutants by homogenous and heterogeneous Fenton reaction process. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2018, 16, 947–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Melin, V.; Hentiquez, A.; Radojkovic, C.; Schwederski, B.; Kaim, W.; Frerr, J.; Contreras, D. Reduction reactivity of catecholamines and their ability to promote a Fenton reaction. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2016, 453, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, J.; Wang, S. Activation of persulfate (PS) and peroxymonosulfate (PMS) and application for the degradation of emerging contamination. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 334, 1502–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Devi, P.; Das, U.; Dalai, A.K. In-situ chemical oxidation: Principle and applications of peroxide and persulfate treatments in wastewater systems. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 571, 643–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Matzek, L.W.; Carter, K.E. Activated persulfate for organic chemical degradation: A review. Chemosphere 2016, 151, 178–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Guo, Y.; Lou, X.; Fang, C.; Xiao, D.; Wang, Z.; Liu, J. Novel photo-sulfite system: Toward simultaneous transformations of inorganic and organic pollutants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 11174–11181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Frisch, M.J.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H.B.; Scuseria, G.E.; Robb, M.A.; Cheeseman, J.R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.; Petersson, G.A.; et al. Gaussian 09, Revision D; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhao, Y.Y.; Truhlar, D.G. The M06 suite of density functionals for main group thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, noncovalent interactions, excited states, and transition elements: Two new functionals and systematic testing of four M06-class functionals and 12 other functionals. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2008, 120, 215–241. [Google Scholar]
  42. Barone, W.; Cossi, M.; Tomasi, J. Geometry optimization of molecular structures in solution by the polarizable continuum model. J. Comput. Chem. 1998, 19, 404–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. El-Desawy, M.; Zayed, M.A.; Ferrag, J. Fragmentation pathway of doxazosin drug: Thermal analysis, mass spectrometry and DFT calculations and NBO analysis. J. Pharm. Appl. Chem. 2017, 3, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Chemical structure of doxazosin mesylate.
Figure 1. Chemical structure of doxazosin mesylate.
Water 11 01001 g001
Figure 2. The changes in UV spectrum of aqueous doxazosin solution (c = 2.0 × 10−5 mol dm−3) subjected to irradiation by simulated solar light at native pH 5.56 versus MilliQ water as a blank.
Figure 2. The changes in UV spectrum of aqueous doxazosin solution (c = 2.0 × 10−5 mol dm−3) subjected to irradiation by simulated solar light at native pH 5.56 versus MilliQ water as a blank.
Water 11 01001 g002
Figure 3. Changes in DOX concentration under influence of Vis-Fe(III)-sulphite system in presence and without TBA.
Figure 3. Changes in DOX concentration under influence of Vis-Fe(III)-sulphite system in presence and without TBA.
Water 11 01001 g003
Figure 4. Energy profile of the proposed reaction mechanism (in terms of ΔG values, kcal/mol).
Figure 4. Energy profile of the proposed reaction mechanism (in terms of ΔG values, kcal/mol).
Water 11 01001 g004
Figure 5. The optimized (at the M06-2X/cc-pVDZ level) geometries of the species involved in the reaction scheme from Figure 4.
Figure 5. The optimized (at the M06-2X/cc-pVDZ level) geometries of the species involved in the reaction scheme from Figure 4.
Water 11 01001 g005
Table 1. The kinetics parameters of doxazosin photodegradation in laboratory solutions and in the presence of natural matrix.
Table 1. The kinetics parameters of doxazosin photodegradation in laboratory solutions and in the presence of natural matrix.
Studied ProcessUsed IrradiationpHk/min−1t1/2/min% of Degradation
Direct photolysisUV 365 nm92.2 × 10−331424
UV 254 nm5.56
9.0
7 × 10−4
4.2 × 10−3
986
164
13
53
Suntest5.56

9.0
4.3 × 10−3 (0–60 min)
3.0 × 10−3 (61–120 min)
1.6 × 10−2 (0–60 min)
1.7 × 10−3 (61–120 min)
160 (0–60 min)
230 (61–120 min)
44 (0–60 min)
406 (61–120 min)
46

71
Direct photolysis in presence of natural matrixRiver I UV365 nm7.942.60 × 10−326625
Suntest7.0 × 10−39854
River IIUV365 nm8.232.80 × 10−324827
Suntest8.5 × 10−38261
River IIIUV365 nm7.542.4 × 10−329023
Suntest14.5 × 10−34880
River IVUV365 nm7.293.1 × 10−322329
Suntest11.0 × 10−36470
Carbonate buffer Suntest8.38.0 ×10−38759
Table 2. Chemical characteristics of the used waters.
Table 2. Chemical characteristics of the used waters.
ParameterRiver 1River 2River 3River 4Reference ValueRef.
53°7′ N; 23°7′ E53°29′ N; 22°44′ E52°20′ N; 23°03′ E52°57′ N; 22°57′ E
pH7.948.237.547.293–1144, 45
Conductivity/μS/cm53056033046010–400046
SO42−/mg L−115.1677.33116.4014.1010–8047
NO3/mg L−170.0022.8421.8835.58<5044, 45, 48
Cl/mg L−1 41.4010.70199.0035.500.4–17049
HCO3/mval L−1 5.805.004.805.60<14 45
Ca/mg L−1 101.709.299.2975.80<25050
Mg/mg L−1 5.982.822.576.20<15050
Fediss/mg L−1 0.330.230.040.77<251
TOC (total organic carbon)/mg L−1 4.401.741.691.62<4052
O2(diss)/mg L−1 10.8854.7037.3015.40>453
Table 3. Kinetic parameters of DOX degradation in advanced oxidation systems.
Table 3. Kinetic parameters of DOX degradation in advanced oxidation systems.
Studied ProcessConcentration of H2O2/mol dm−3Concentration of Fe2+/mol dm−3pHk/min−1t1/2/min% of Degradation
UV/H2O25 × 10−4 11.6 × 10−359.772
10−4 11.9 × 10−358.573
10−2-812.10 × 10−357.273.5
5 × 10−2 12.50 × 10−355.574.5
Classical Fenton reaction k/min−1mol−1 dm3
10−410−4 52.598215
2 × 10−410−4 127.653527
10 × 10−410−4 332.820048
10−42 × 10−4 51.295612
10−45 × 10−4 45.0135111
10−410 × 10−4 5.598231.5
Photo-Fenton reaction10−410−4 86.665725
2 × 10−410−4 296.024446
10 × 10−410−4 3308.031100
10−42 × 10−43.571.878521
10−45 × 10−4 265.023950
10−410 × 10−4 53.0100217
UV/Fe(III)-SO32−Concentration of Fe2(SO4)3/mol dm−3Concentration of Na2SO3/mol dm−3
5 × 10−510−3 25382261
5 × 10−52 × 10−3 13244163
5 × 10−53 × 10−3 7157759
5 × 10−54 × 10−3 3945858
10−410−3 7892775
1.5 × 10−410−3 5879366
2 × 10−410−3 54410064
Vis/Fe(III)-SO3210−410−3 19863100
Vis/Fe(III)-SO32/TBA10−410−3 75

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Karpinska, J.; Sokol, A.; Koldys, J.; Ratkiewicz, A. Studies on the Kinetics of Doxazosin Degradation in Simulated Environmental Conditions and Selected Advanced Oxidation Processes. Water 2019, 11, 1001. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11051001

AMA Style

Karpinska J, Sokol A, Koldys J, Ratkiewicz A. Studies on the Kinetics of Doxazosin Degradation in Simulated Environmental Conditions and Selected Advanced Oxidation Processes. Water. 2019; 11(5):1001. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11051001

Chicago/Turabian Style

Karpinska, Joanna, Aneta Sokol, Jolanta Koldys, and Artur Ratkiewicz. 2019. "Studies on the Kinetics of Doxazosin Degradation in Simulated Environmental Conditions and Selected Advanced Oxidation Processes" Water 11, no. 5: 1001. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11051001

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop