THE UK Government’s replacement scheme for Erasmus+ has been described as “extremely disappointing” for students in Scotland who want to live, study and travel in Europe.
Officially announced today, the new scheme includes a fraction of the benefits provided to students under Erasmus+ as free tuition and travel expenses have been scrapped and the cost of living allowance has been slashed by a fifth.
Around 2000 Scottish students and staff used Erasmus+ each year and now they will be denied the chance to study and travel in 27 other EU countries as the new scheme puts financial barriers in front of them.
First Minister Nicola Sturgeon branded the decision by UK ministers to leave the Erasmus+ programme as an act of “cultural vandalism”.
Academics have also raised concerns that the UK Government is focusing on promoting links with countries outside Europe to help build links with potential trading partners such as Australia or the US.
In an attempt to fix this, the Scottish Government – as well as more than 140 European Parliament members – wrote to the European Commission urging officials to explore ways of keeping Scotland in the programme, but this was ruled out by the EU since Scotland is still part of the United Kingdom.
Commenting, Education Committee convener Clare Adamson MSP said: “This is extremely disappointing for students in Scotland who want to enjoy the benefits of having access to 27 other EU countries, the Turing Scheme does nothing to help students do that and has put financial barriers in their way.
“Boris Johnson promised that the UK would continue to be a part of Erasmus+, that has turned out to be a massive lie and his replacement scheme is a shadow of Erasmus+.
“Tory MP Andrew Bowie admitted last week that the younger generations are not seeing the benefit of Brexit and this is another blow to their future prospects, all at the hands of the Tories and their hard Brexit obsession.
“Thousands of students in Scotland have benefitted from the Erasmus+ scheme and have enriched their education as a result of it, but now that opportunity seems further away now more than ever.
“The only way students in Scotland will be able to access Erasmus+ now is when Scotland becomes and independent country and re-enters the European Union at the top table.”
Speaking last month, policy adviser for the European Movement in Scotland Alex Orr concluded: “Scotland attracts proportionally more Erasmus participants from across Europe – and sends more in the other direction – than any other country in the UK. Through associated youth work projects, the scheme is estimated to deliver at least £7 in value for every £1 it costs in public cash, and its value to the economy has been estimated to be worth nearly £34 million annually since 2014.
“A unilateral replacement, such as the proposed Turing Scheme, will never be able to replicate the wealth of opportunities for all young people, or raise the same reciprocal benefits of the Erasmus programme,” Orr added.
A UK Government spokesperson said: “These findings are incredibly misleading. Unlike Erasmus+, the Turing scheme will include opportunities to study and work in countries across the world and builds in benefits for those from disadvantaged backgrounds and areas of the UK that have had low uptake.
“For a typical HE student on a study placement, the grant rates paid under the Turing Scheme will be in line with those under Erasmus+, and in fact will be higher for high cost destinations, and the uplift for disadvantaged students will also be higher. As is typical for all HE student mobilities, including outside of Erasmus+, we expect tuition fees to be waived.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel