Skip to main content

Negotiating (Dis)ability in the Context of Chronic Pain Rehabilitation: Challenges for Patients and Practitioners

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Discursive Psychology and Disability

Abstract

This chapter describes a discursive psychological study on how chronic pain-related disability is negotiated during interviews on admission to chronic pain rehabilitation. Nine patients participated in audio recordings of their admission interview at a rehabilitation unit. Six practitioners were involved in these consultations. The analysis shows that patients’ pain-related disability is not treated as a matter of course. Patients make an interactional effort to construct their disabilities as factual. They construct their inability to perform certain actions as consequential to their pain and present adjustments in their behaviour as inevitable. Practitioners, however, challenge such representations by constructing patients’ behaviour as insufficiently accounted for and by proposing treatment directions that imply that patients could become more active.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Åsbring, P., & Närvänen, A. (2002). Women’s experiences of stigma in relation to chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia. Qualitative Health Research, 12(2), 148–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973230201200202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burbaum, C., Stresing, A.-M., Fritzsche, K., Auer, P., Wirsching, M., & Lucius-Hoene, G. (2010). Medically unexplained symptoms as a threat to patients’ identity? A conversation analysis of patients’ reactions to psychosomatic attributions. Patient Education and Counseling, 79(2), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.043.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, V., Kitzinger, C., & Potter, J. (2004). ‘Kids are just cruel anyway’: Lesbian and gay parents’ talk about homophobic bullying. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43(4), 531–550. https://doi.org/10.1348/0144666042565362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards. (1997). Discourse and cognition. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. (1994). Script formulations: An analysis of event descriptions in conversation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13(3), 211–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X94133001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. (2006). Facts, norms and dispositions: Practical uses of the modal verb would in police interrogations. Discourse Studies, 8(4), 475–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606064830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. (2007). Managing subjectivity in talk. In A. Hepburn & S. Wiggins (Eds.), Discursive research in practice: New approaches to psychology and interaction (pp. 31–49). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1993). Language and causation: A discursive action model of description and attribution. Psychological Review, 100(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.1.23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (2001). Discursive psychology. In A. McHoul & M. Rapley (Eds.), How to analyse talk in institutional settings. A casebook of methods (pp. 12–14). Continuum International Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (2005). Discursive psychology, mental states and descriptions. In H. te Molder & J. Potter (Eds.), Conversation and cognition (pp. 241–259). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, K., Garland-Thomson, R., Kent, M., & R, R. (2019). Interdisciplinary approaches to disabiliy. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fasulo, A., & Fiore, F. (2007). A valid person: non-competence as a conversational outcome. In A. Hepburn & S. Wiggins (Eds.), Discursive research in practice: New approaches to psychology and interaction (pp. 224–246). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611216.012.

  • Gatchel, R. J., Peng, Y. B., Peters, M. L., Fuchs, P. N., & Turk, D. C. (2007). The biopsychosocial approach to chronic pain: Scientific advances and future directions. Psychological Bulletin, 133(4), 581–624. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.581.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodley, D., Lawthom, R., Liddiard, K., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2019). Provocations for critical disability studies. Discourse & Society, 34(6), 972–997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasenbring, M. I., Chehadi, O., Titze, C., & Kreddig, N. (2014). Fear and anxiety in the transition from acute to chronic pain: There is evidence for endurance besides avoidance. Pain Management, 4(5), 363–374. https://doi.org/10.2217/pmt.14.36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hepburn, A., & Potter, J. (2011). Designing the recipient: Managing advice resistance in institutional settings. Social Psychology Quarterly, 74(2), 216–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272511408055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heritage, J. (2009). Negotiating the legitimacy of medical problems. In D. Brashers & D. Godsmith (Eds.), Communicating to manage health and illness (pp. 147–164). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heritage, J. (2011). Territories of knowledge, territories of experience: Empathic moments in interaction. In T. Stivers, L. Mondada, & J. Steensig (Eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation (pp. 159–183). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heritage, J., & Robinson, J. D. (2006). Accounting for the visit: Giving reasons for seeking medical care. In J. Heritage & D. Maynard (Eds.), Communication in medical care: Interactions between primary care physicians and patients (pp. 48–85). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, I., Sofaer-Bennett, B., & Walker, J. (2007). The stigmatisation of people with chronic back pain. Disability and Rehabilitation, 29(18), 1454–1464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton-Salway, M. (2001). Narrative identities and the management of personal accountability in talk about me: A discursive psychology approach to illness narrative. Journal of Health Psychology, 6(2), 247–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, G. (1990). List construction as a task and resource. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Interaction competence: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis (pp. 63–92). University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–32). John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lester, J. N. (2014). Negotiating abnormality/normality in therapy talk: A discursive psychology approach to the study of therapeutic interactions and children with autism. Qualitative Psychology, 1(2), 178–193. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, D., & Seymour, J. (2003). ‘I am Normal on the ‘Net’: Disability, computerised communication technologies and the embodied self. In J. Coupland & R. Gwyn (Eds.), Discourse, the body, and identity (pp. 246–265). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monzoni, C. M., Duncan, R., Grünewald, R., & Reuber, M. (2011). Are there interactional reasons why doctors may find it hard to tell patients that their physical symptoms may have emotional causes? A conversation analytic study in neurology outpatients. Patient Education and Counseling, 85(3), e189–e200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2011.07.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nettleton, S. (2006). ‘I just want permission to be ill’: Towards a sociology of medically unexplained symptoms. Social Science and Medicine, 62(5), 1167–1178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.07.030.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas, M., & Blyth, F. (2016). Are self-management strategies effective in chronic pain treatment? Pain Management, 6(1), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.2217/pmt.15.57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, S. B. (2018). ‘And how long have you been sick?’: The discursive construction of symptom duration during acute general practice visits and its implications for ‘doctorability’. Time & Society, 37(3), 330–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X15609808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ong, B. N., Hooper, H., Dunn, K., & Croft, P. (2004). Establishing self and meaning in low back pain narratives. Sociological Review, 52(4), 532–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2004.00494.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomerantz, A. (1986). Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies, 9(2–3), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J. (1998). Discursive social psychology: From attitudes to evaluative practices. European Review of Social Psychology, 9(1), 233–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779843000090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapley, M., Kiernan, P., & Antaki, C. (1998). Invisible to themselves or negotiating identity? The interactional management of ‘being intellectually disabled’. Disability and Society, 13(5), 807–827. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599826524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidnell, J. (2012). “Who knows best?”: Evidentiality and epistemic asymmetry in conversation. Pragmatics and Society, 3(2), 294–320. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.3.2.08sid.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snelgrove, S., & Liossi, C. (2009). An interpretative phenomenological analysis of living with chronic low back pain. British Journal of Health Psychology, 14(4), 735–749. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910709X402612.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Speer, S. A. (2006). Gatekeeping gender: Some features of the use of hypothetical questions in the psychiatric assessment of transsexual patients. Discourse & Society, 17(6), 785–812. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506068433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stinesen, B., Sneijder, P., Köke, A., & Smeets, R. (2019). Improving patient–practitioner interaction in chronic pain rehabilitation: The merits of a discursive psychological approach. Scandinavian Journal of Pain, 19(4), 843–853. https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2019-0034.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swaan, J., Schiphorst Preuper, H., & Smeets, R. (2019). Multifactoriële analyse in de medisch-specialistische revalidatie [Multifactorial analysis in specialized medical rehabilitation]. In J. Verbunt, J. Swaan, H. Schiphorst Preuper, & K. Scheurs (Eds.), Handboek pijnrevalidatie: Voor de eerste-, tweede- en derdelijnsgezondheidszorg [Handbook of pain rehabilitation: For primary, second-line and third-line medical care] (pp. 69–85). Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeek, J., Sengers, M., Riemens, L., & Haafkens, J. (2004). Patient expectations of treatment for back pain: A systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies. Spine, 29(20), 2309–2318. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000142007.38256.7f.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Versteeg, W., & te Molder, H. (2019). Making expertise fit: On the use of certified versus experiential knowledge in becoming an informed patient. Journal of Health Psychology, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105319847255.

  • Werner, A., Isaksen, L., & Malterud, K. (2004). ‘I am not the kind of woman who complains of everything’: Illness stories on self and shame in women with chronic pain. Social Science and Medicine, 59(5), 1035–1045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.12.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Werner, A., & Malterud, K. (2003). It is hard work behaving as a credible patient: Encounters between women with chronic pain and their doctors. Social Science and Medicine, 57(8), 1409–1419. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00520-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, S. (2004). Good for ‘you’: Generic and individual healthy eating advice in family mealtimes. Journal of Health Psychology, 9(4), 535–548. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105304044037.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, S. (2014). On the accountability of changing bodies: Using discursive psychology to examine embodied identities in different research settings. Qualitative Psychology, 1(2), 144–162. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, S. (2017). Discursive psychology. Theory, method and applications. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, S., & Potter, J. (2017). Disursive psychology. In C. Willig & W. Stainton-Rogers (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology (2nd ed., pp. 93–109). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Baukje B. Stinesen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Stinesen, B.B., Sneijder, P., Smeets, R.J. (2021). Negotiating (Dis)ability in the Context of Chronic Pain Rehabilitation: Challenges for Patients and Practitioners. In: Lester, J.N. (eds) Discursive Psychology and Disability. Palgrave Studies in Discursive Psychology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71760-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics