skip to main content
10.1145/1240866.1241046acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Value scenarios: a technique for envisioning systemic effects of new technologies

Authors Info & Claims
Published:28 April 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we argue that there is a scarcity of methods which support critical, systemic, long-term thinking in current design practice, technology development and deployment. To address this need we introduce value scenarios, an extension of scenario-based design which can support envisioning the systemic effects of new technologies. We identify and describe five key elements of value scenarios; stakeholders, pervasiveness, time, systemic effects, and value implications. We provide two examples of value scenarios, which draw from our current work on urban simulation and human-robotic interaction . We conclude with suggestions for how value scenarios might be used by others.

References

  1. Arendt, H. The human condition. Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL, USA, 1958.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Benyon, D. and Macaulay, C. Scenarios and the HCI--SE design problem. Interacting with Computers, 14, (2002), 397--405.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Blythe, M. A., & Wright, P. C. Pastiche scenarios: Fiction as a resource for user centered design. Interacting with Computers, 18, 5 (2006), 1139--1164. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Borning, A., Waddell, P., and Förster, R. UrbanSim: Using simulation to inform public deliberation and decision making. http://www.urbansim.org/papers/borning--urbansim--case--study--2006.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Dubos, R. (1980). Man Adapting. Yale University Press, Boston, MA, USA, 7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Dunne, A., & Raby, F. Design Noir: The secret life of electronic objects. August Media, Boston, MA, USA, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H., Jr., and Borning, A. Value Sensitive Design and information systems. In Z. Ping and D. Galletta (Eds.), Human--Computer Interaction and Management Information Systems: Foundations. M.E. Sharpe, Inc., Armonk, NY, USA, 2006, 348--372.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Intelligent Robotics Laboratory. http://www.ed.ams.eng.osaka-u.ac.jp/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Rosson, M. B., and Carroll, J. M. Scenario-based design. In J. A. Jacko & A. Sears (Eds.), The human-computer interaction handbook: Fundamentals, evolving technologies, and emerging applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, USA, 2003, 1032--1050. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Value scenarios: a technique for envisioning systemic effects of new technologies

      Recommendations

      Reviews

      John M. Artz

      When a new technology comes along?for example, personal robots, virtual worlds, or human cloning?the potential impact can be enormous. And yet, how is the designer of the technology supposed to factor all of those implications into the design of the technology__?__ Tough question. One way is for the designer to attempt to anticipate, as well as possible, what those implications may be. But, again, how can that be done__?__ This paper offers one possibility: value scenarios. Value scenarios are systematically constructed narratives for exploring the implications of a technology from the perspective of the stakeholders, the pervasiveness of the technology, the time frame of the effects, and the extent to which the effects are systemic. The paper provides two scenarios to illustrate how value scenarios can be used. The paper has merit to the extent that people who design new technologies really should think ahead about the potential impacts of those technologies. The notion of value scenarios does provide a little structure to that process. At the same time, value scenarios as described would require great creativity and insight on the part of the designer, and a designer with this level of creativity and insight might well be able to anticipate impacts without having to use a technique such as this. A larger problem is the fact that technologies evolve over time, and frequently find their way into unintended uses, for better or for worse. It is unlikely that the designers of a significant technology will be able to anticipate the evolution and unintended uses, much less the impacts of the unintended uses. So, while the paper is certainly well intended, it is not at all that clear how much value it really contributes to the discussion. Online Computing Reviews Service

      Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

      Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI EA '07: CHI '07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2007
        1286 pages
        ISBN:9781595936424
        DOI:10.1145/1240866

        Copyright © 2007 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 28 April 2007

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI EA '07 Paper Acceptance Rate212of582submissions,36%Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader