Abstract
Purpose
This paper presents a critical reflection of pertinent methodological and ethical issues associated with qualitative research on domestic abuse, and synthesises existing models of research to provide ethical, practical, and methodological implications.
Methods
Drawing on the combined research and front-line experience of the authors it explores four critical areas: power, participation, payment, and platform.
Results
Current practices sometimes lack transparency and may perpetuate marginalisation in studies of some with lived experience of domestic violence and abuse which can be considered symbolic violence. There lacks consistency in participant payment, or research on participants’ perceptions of payment. The final section addresses challenges of including perpetrators as participants, highlighting the learning that could occur as a result of inclusion, noting the associated risks of perceived collusion or endorsement of harmful behaviour.
Conclusions
This paper contributes to scholarship regarding domestic abuse research through exploration of participation, remuneration, and the unique complexities of domestic abuse perpetrator involvement. We foreground the importance of articulating and managing power dynamics in domestic abuse research, and suggest measures to ensure such dynamics are mitigated successfully to ensure participation is accessible to all. The paper argues for further consideration of payment protocols, and inclusion of the decision-making process in published research. Further it recognises perpetrator exclusion from research can result in victim/survivors being held responsible for raising awareness and developing knowledge of domestic abuse, consequently researchers should consider perpetrator participation where possible. The paper concludes with recommendations for those engaged in domestic violence and abuse research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aluwihare-Samaranayake, D. (2012). Ethics in qualitative research: A view of the participants’ and researchers’ world from a critical standpoint. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 11(2), 64–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691201100208
AQR. (2022). Safety guidance for qualitative research fieldwork. Retrieved July 25, 2022, from https://www.aqr.org.uk/refsection/safety-guidance.shtml
Beckerman, N. L., & Wozniak, D. F. (2018). Domestic violence counsellors and Secondary Traumatic Stress (STS): A brief qualitative report and strategies for support. Social Work in Mental Health, 16(4), 470–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332985.2018.1425795
Bentley, J. P., & Thacker, P. G. (2004). The influence of risk and monetary payment on the research participation decision making process. Journal of Medical Ethics, 30, 293–298. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2002.001594
Bent-Goodley, T. B. (2005). Culture and domestic violence. Transforming knowledge development. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(2), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260504269050
Boivin, A., Richards, T., Forsythe, L., Gregoire, A., L’Esperance, A., Abelson, J., & Carman, K. L. (2018). Evaluating patient and public involvement in research. BMJ, 363, k5147. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k5147
Bourdieu, P. (1999). Understanding. In P. Bourdieu & G. Balazs (Eds.), The Weight of the World: Social Suffering in Contemporary Society (pp. 607–626). Stanford University Press.
Braaf, R., & Barrett Meyering, I. (2010) Seeking Security: Promoting women’s economic wellbeing following domestic violence. Australian Domestic and Family Violence Clearinghouse. March 2011. Retrieved April 11, 2023, from https://webarchive.nla.gov.au/awa/20120202023049/http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/132053/20120202-1329/www.adfvc.unsw.edu.au/PDF+files/Seeking+Security+Report+WEB.pdf
British Psychological Society (BPS). (2021). Code of ethics and conduct. Retrieved April 10, 2023, from https://cms.bps.org.uk/sites/default/files/2022-06/BPS%20Code%20of%20Ethics%20and%20Conduct.pdf
Corvo, K., & Johnson, P. J. (2003). Vilification of the “batterer”: How blame shapes domestic violence policy and interventions. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 8(3), 259–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-1789(01)00060-X
Chronister, K. M., Wettersen, K. B., & Brown, C. (2004). Vocational research for liberation of battered women. Counselling Psychologist, 32(6), 900–922. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000004269300
Cryder, C. E., London, A. J., Volpp, K. G., & Lowewenstein, G. (2010). Informative inducement: Study payment as a signal of risk. Social Science and Medicine, 70, 455–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.10.047
Daw, J. (2021). Your best friend. Retrieved April 19, 2023, from https://files.yourbestfriend.org.uk/Yourbestfrienddiscoveryreport110122.pdf
Dickert, M., Emmanuel, E., & Grady, C. (2002). Paying research subjects: An analysis of current policies. Annual of International Medicine, 136, 368–373. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-136-5-200203050-00009
Dickert, N., & Grady, C. (1999). What's the price of a research subject? Approaches to payment for research participation. New England Journal of Medicine, 341, 198–203.
Donovan, C., & Barnes, R. (2020). Queering Narratives of Domestic Violence and Abuse. Palgrave.
Donovan, C., & Hester, M. (2014). Domestic Violence and Sexuality: What’s love got to do with it? Policy Press.
Downes, J., Kelly, L., & Westmarland, N. (2014). Ethics in violence and abuse research - a positive empowerment approach. Sociological Research Online, 19(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.3140
Dutton, M. A., Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Jouriles, E., McDonarld, R., Krishnan, S., McFarlane, J., & Sullivan, C. (2003). Recruitment and retention in intimate partner violence research. Retrieved June 21, 2022, from https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/201943.pdf
Emmanuel, E. J. D., Wendler, C., & Grady, C. (2000). What makes clinical research ethical? JAMA, 283(20), 2701–2711. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.20.2701
Fenge, L. A., Oakley, L., Taylor, B., & Beer, S. (2019). The impact of sensitive research on the researcher: Preparedness and positionality. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919893161
Fisher, P. (2012). Ethics in qualitative research: “Vunerability”, citizenship and human rights. Ethics and Social Welfare, 6(1), 2–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2011.591811
Florczack, K. L. (2016). Power relations: Their embodiment in research. Nursing Science Quarterly, 29(3), 192–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894318416647167
Gabriel, L., James, H., Cronin-Davis, J., Tizro, Z., Beetham, T., Hullock, A., & Ranar, A. (2017). Reflexive research with mothers and children victims of domestic violence. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 17(2), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12117
Gondolf, E. W. (2000). Human subject issues in batterer program evaluation. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma, 4(1), 273–297. https://doi.org/10.1300/J146v04n01_12
Goodman, L. A., Liang, B., Helms, J. E., Latta, R. E., Sparks, E., & Weintraub, S. R. (2004). Training counselling psychologists as social justice agents: Feminist and multicultural principles in action. Counselling Psychologist, 32(6), 793–837. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000004268802
Gordon, S. B., Chinula, L., Chilima, B., Mwapasa, V., Dabadhai, S., & Mlombe, Y. (2018). A Malawi guideline for research study participant remuneration. Clinical Practise Article, 3, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14668.2
Gracia, E. (2004). Unreported cases of domestic violence against women: Towards an epidemiology of social silence, tolerance, and inhibition. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 58, 536–537. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2003.019604
Hanson, R. K., Letourneau, E. J., Olver, M. E., Wilson, R. J., & Miner, M. H. (2012). Incentives for offender research participation are both ethical and practical. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(11), 1391–1404.
Head, E. (2009). The ethics and implications of paying participants in qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(4), 335–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570802246724
Hearn, J., Andersson, K., & Cowburn, M. (2007). Background paper on guidelines for researchers on doing research with perpetrators of sexual violence. Project report. Sexual Violence Research Initiative. Retrieved May 12, 2022, from http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/4997/1/perpetrators.pdf
Home Office. (2012). New definition of domestic abuse. Retrieved June 07, 2023, from https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-definition-ofdomestic-violence#:~:text=The%20new%20definition%20of%20domestic,regardless%20of%20gender%20or%20sexuality
Home Office. (2019). The economic and social costs of domestic abuse. Research Report, 107. Retrieved May 19, 2022, from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/918897/horr107.pdf
Houghton, C. (2015). Young people’s perspectives on participatory ethics: Agency, power and impact in domestic abuse research and policy making. Child Abuse Review, 24, 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.2407
Jackson, T., Pinnock, H., Liew, S. M., Horne, E., Ehrlich, E., Fulton, O., Worth, A., Sheikh, A., & De Simoni, A. (2020). Patient and public involvement in research: From tokenistic box ticking to valued team members. BMC Medicine, 18, 79. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01544-7
Johnson, M. P. (2008). A typology of domestic violence: Intimate terrorism, violent resistance, and situational couple violence. Northeastern University Press.
Jury, R. (2022). Collaborative inquiry with men who use intimate partner violence: Service user perspectives on expertise in domestic violence services for men. Journal of Family Violence., 38, 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-022-00369-7
Jury, R., & Boxall, K. (2018). Working with the enemy? Social work education and men who use intimate partner violence. Social Work Education, 37(4), 507–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2018.1433157
Karnieli-Miller, O., Strier, R., & Pessach, L. (2009). Power relations in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 19(2), 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732308329306
Largent, E. A., Emanuel, E. J., & Lynch, H. F. (2019). Filthy lucre or fitting offer? Understanding worries about payments to research participants. The American Journal of Bioethics, 19(9), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2019.1631076
Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., & Turner, L. A. (2012). The efficacy of an intimate partner violence prevention program with high-risk adolescent girls: A preliminary test. Prevention Science, 13, 284–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-011-0240-7
Lee-Treweek, G., & Linkogle, S. (2000). Danger in the field: Risk and ethics in social research. Routledge.
Leye, E., Mergaert, L., Arnaut, C., & O’Brien Green, S. (2014). Towards a better estimation of prevalence of female genital mutilation in the European Union: Interpreting existing evidence in all EU Member States. Genus, 70(1), 99–121. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-00947-2
Logan, T. K., Walker, R., Shannon, J., & Cole, J. (2008). Combining ethical considerations with recruitment strategies for partner violence victimisation research. Violence against Women, 14(11), 1226–1251. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801208323976
Macklin, R. (1981). “Due” and “Undue” inducements: On paying money to research subjects. Ethics & Human Research, 3(5), 1–6.
Malpass, A., Sales, K., & Feder, G. (2016). Reducing symbolic violence in the research encounter: Collaborating with a survivor of domestic abuse in a qualitative study in UK primary care. Sociology of Health and Illness, 38(3), 442–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12352
McGarry, J. (2010). Exploring the effect of conducting sensitive research. Nurse Researcher, 19(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2010.10.18.1.8.c8043
McGarry, J., & Ali, P. (2016). Researching domestic violence and abuse in healthcare settings: Challenges and issues. Journal of Research in Nursing., 21(5–6), 465–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987116650923
McGinn, T., Taylor, B., & McColgan, M. (2021). A Qualitative Study of the perspectives of domestic violence survivors on behaviour change programs with perpetrators. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(17–18), NP9364–NP9390. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519855663
Meechem, S., Smith, Z., & Taylor, B. (2023). Verge of Harming: exploring abuse in young people’s relationships and support for young people who harm. Retrieved March 02, 2023, from https://communications.safelivesresearch.org.uk/Verge_of_Harming_Report.pdf
Mergaert, L., Arnaut, C., Exterkate, M., O’Brien Green, S., Strid, S., & Leye, E. (2015). Estimation of girls at risk of female genital mutilation in the European Union. European Institute for Gender Equality Retrieved April 02, 2022, from https://eige.europa.eu/publications/estimation-girlsrisk-female-genital-mutilation-european-union-report-0
Millum, J., & Garnett, M. (2019). How participant payment for research can be coercive. American Journal of Bioethics, 19(9), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2019.1630497
Minnich, E. K. (1991). Transforming knowledge. Temple University Press.
Montoya, C., & Rolandsen Agustin, L. (2013). The othering of domestic violence: The EU and cultural framings of violence against women. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society, 20(4), 534–557. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxt020
Morgan, K., & Björkert, S. T. (2006). “I’d rather you’d lay me on the floor and start kicking me”: Understanding symbolic violence in everyday life. Women’s Studies International Forum, 29(5), 441–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2006.07.002
Moylan, C. A., Herrenkohl, T. I., Sousa, C., Tajima, E. A., Herrenkohl, R. C., & Russo, M. J. (2010). The effects of child abuse and exposure to domestic violence on adolescent internalizing and externalizing behaviour problems. Journal of Family Violence, 25, 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-009-9269-9
NHS. (2021). Working with our patient and public voices (PPV) partners; Reimbursing expenses and paying involvement payments. Retrieved January 23, 2023, from https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/B0869_Working-with-patient-and-public-voice-partners-reimbursing-expensesand-paying-involvement-payments.pdf
NIHR. (2022). Payment guidance for members of the public considering involvement in research. Version 1.3. Retrieved January 23, 2023, from. https://www.nihr.ac.uk/documents/payment-guidance-for-members-of-the-public-considering-involvement-in-research/27372
O’Brien Green, S. (2018). ‘I have a story to tell’: Researching migrant women’s experiences of female genital mutilation and gender-based violence in Ireland and Europe. Social Work & Social Sciences Review, 19(3), 134–151. https://doi.org/10.1921/swssr.v19i3.1195
Office for National Statistics. (2022). Domestic abuse prevalence and trends, England and Wales: year ending March 2022. Retrieved February 12, 2023, from https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/articles/domesticabuseprevalenceandtrendsenglandandwales/yearendingmarch2022
Polacsek, M., Boardman, G., & McCann, T. (2016). Paying patient and caregiver research participants: Putting theory into practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 73(4), 847–856. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13222
Postmus, J. L., Hoge, G. L., Breckenridge, J., Sharp-Jeffsm, N., & Chung, D. (2020). Economic abuse as an invisible form of domestic violence: A multicountry review. Trauma Violence and Abuse, 21(2), 261–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838018764160
Reardon, S. L., & Trevillion, K. (2016). Responding to domestic abuse in England and Wales. In D. Peterson & J. Schroeder (Eds.), Domestic abuse in International Context (1st ed., pp. 55–73). Routledge.
Reich, N. M. (2002). Towards a rearticulation of women-as-victims: A thematic analysis of the construction of women’s identities surrounding gendered violence. Communication Quarterly, 50(3–4), 292–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370209385665
Roskill, C. (2011). Research in three children’s services authorities. In C. Ashley (Ed.), Working with risky fathers: Fathers Matter Volume 3: Research Findings on working with domestically abusive fathers and their involvement with children’s social care services, London, Family Rights Group.
Rowlingson, K., & McKay, S. (1998). The growth of lone parenthood: Diversity and dynamics. Policy Studies Institute.
Russell, M. L., Moralejo, D. G., & Burgess, E. D. (2000). Paying research subjects: Participants’ perspectives. Journal of Medical Ethics, 26, 126–130.
SafeLives. (2021). Your best friend. Retrieved March 06, 2023, from https://safelives.org.uk/your-best-friend
Saunders, C. A., & Sugar, A. M. (1999). What’s the price of a research subject? New England Journal of Medicine, 341(1), 1550–1551. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199911113412016
Scantelbury, K. (2005). Maintaining ethical and professional relationships in large qualitative studies: A quixotic ideal? Art, 3(39). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-6.3.35
Sharma, A., & Borah, S. B. (2022). Covid-19 and domestic violence: An indirect path to social and economic crisis. Journal of Family Violence, 37, 759–765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-020-00188-8
SRA. (2023). Social Research Association research ethics guidance. Retrieved March 10, 2023, from https://the-sra.org.uk/SRA/SRA/Ethics/Research-Ethics-Guidance.aspx
Surmiak, A. (2020). Ethical concerns of paying cash to vulnerable participants: The qualitative researchers’ views. Qualitative Report, 25(12), 4461–4480. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4441
Surviving Economic Abuse. (2023). What is economic abuse? Retrieved February 06, 2023, from https://survivingeconomicabuse.org/what-iseconomic-abuse/
Taylor, J., & Clarence, B. (2021). Beneficial but triggering: Experiences and support of survivor speakers in the UK. Victim Focus, (October 2021). Retrieved May 25, 2022, from https://victimfocus-resources.com/products/survivor-speakers-and-experts-by-experience-study
Thirtyone:eight. (2021). Safeguarding during and post COVID-19, roundtable. Retrieved April 10, 2023, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XAC9sike-s0&t=11s
Thompson, S. (1996). Paying respondents and informants. Social Research Update, 14, 1–5. Retrieved March 17, 2022, from
UN Women. (2021). UN Women raises awareness of the shadow pandemic of violence against women during COVID-19. 27 May 2020. [Press release] Retrieved June 02, 2022, from https://www.unwomen.org/en/news/stories/2020/5/press-release-the-shadow-pandemic-of-violence-against-womenduring-covid-19
UN Women. (2022). Facts and figures. ending violence against women and girls. Retrieved April 22, 2022, from https://www.unwomen.org/en/whatwe-do/ending-violence-against-women/facts-and-figures
Vearey, J., Barter, C., Hynes, P., & McGinn, T. (2017). Research ethics in practice: Lessons from studies exploring interpersonal violence in different contexts. Families, Relationships and Societies, 6(2), 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1332/204674316X14673790283737
Watlington, C. G., & Murphy, C. M. (2006). The roles of religion and spirituality among African American survivors of domestic violence. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(7), 837–857. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20268
Weber, S., & Thomas, S. (2021). Engaging in Gender-Based Violence Research: Adopting a Feminist and Participatory Perspective. In C. Bradbury-Jones & L. Isham (Eds.), Understanding Gender-based Violence (pp. 257–269). Springer Nature Link.
Wilkinson, M., & Moore, A. (1999). Inducements revisited. Bioethics, 13(2), 89–182.
World Health Organisation. (2016). Ethical and safety recommendations for intervention research on violence against women. Retrieved February 04, 2023, from https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/251759/9789241510189-eng.pdf
World Health Organisation. (2021). Violence against women prevalence estimates, 2018. Retrieved February 04, 2023, from https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240022256
Women's Aid. (2020). Research Integrity Framework. Retrieved March 14, 2022, from https://www.womensaid.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Research-Integrity-Framework-RIF-on-Domestic-Violence-and-Abuse-DVA-November-2020.pdf
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank the reviewers and editorial team for their comments on this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
McGregor, K., Taylor, B. & Oakley, L. Power, Participation, Payment and Platform: Ethical and Methodological Issues in Recruitment in Qualitative Domestic Abuse Research. J Fam Viol 38, 1029–1041 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-023-00590-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-023-00590-y